Dinesh D’Souza’s movie “2,000 Mules” is introduced with Joe Biden saying, “We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American Politics.” Then follows 1 hour and 28 minutes of solid evidence proving his admission in the 2020 presidential election that should satisfy a conviction in any real court in the land. If the person accused boastfully admits guilt—through the fraud organization he created—why not accept his word at face value? His organization stole the election for him.
With this confession why has Biden not been impeached by his own political party? Because he, his party, and RINO Republicans are part of the “fraud organization” he admits having created. To establish his quilt we do not need the 2021 Arizona Forensic Audit or other audits since, all further verifying the Biden claim, nor even “2,000 Mules.” The need is to catch his accomplices.
I waited more than a month to consider opposing arguments before commenting on this bombshell, jaw-dropping movie showing the crimes committed in real time by state installed cameras and geotracking the cellphones of those committing the crimes. Was their enough evidence to have turned the election in the five contested states? With certainty!!!
Only The Associated Press dared make a feeble attempt to do so which was easily debunked by Planet Today (“Fact Checking the Fact Checkers: Debunking AP’s ‘2000 Mules’ Hit Piece,” May 16, 2022). Otherwise, Big Tech and all the networks who treat everything detrimental to Biden as disinformation participated in its coverup. Even Fox News and NewsMax did nothing to promote “2,000 Mules.” Sandra Smith of Fox News made a snide remark that the election fraud issue had been debunked months ago refusing to even look at the new, compelling and very different, data presented by “2000 Mules.” Consequently most informed people have moved to Rumble and other Internet platforms for reliable information on this and many other issues.
Despite the massive news blackout of “2,000 Mules,” excepting word of mouth and uncensored outlets, as of June 3, 2022 had been well attended. Rasmussen Reports survey reported, that “over 20 million” had seen it and that “77% said that the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election.” The poll survey of a 1,000 who watched also showed that the movie was being viewed by Democrats and non-affiliated groups as well (“Convincing: 77% believe 2000 Mules, and 20M have seen it,” by Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner, June 3, 2022).
On Amazon it’s the number one release in the “Movies and TV” category thus far this year. As a documentary, it is the “year’s biggest documentary hit of 2022 … to date.” In its first two weeks of release it earned $1.3 million (“‘2000 Mules’ Is Year’s Top-Grossing Documentary (So Far),” by Christian Toto, HitHollywood, June 3, 2022).
As mentioned “2000 Mules,” utilizing the research of True The Vote founders Cathrine Engel Brecht and Gregg Phillips, offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video each placing the crime and criminal in the same place. “The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in drop boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence.”
According to Phillips,“True The Vote analyzed more than a petabyte (1,000 terabytes) of data from smartphones in Phoenix, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Las Vegas, covering the time period from October 1 through Election Day (and through January 6 in Georgia to cover the Senate runoff). In Atlanta, the group says that by using that data they identified 242 ‘mules’ who met their criteria (visited 10 different ballot drop boxes and at least five different nonprofit organizations identified as ‘stash houses’ during that time frame” (https://www.planet-today.com/2022/05/fact-checking-fact-checkers-debunking.html).
Yes America, Democrats stole the election of 2020 and seated an illegitimate president. Arrests from the evidence presented in “2,000 Mules” is already in progress. A grand jury in Russel County Virginia has indicted Knox District Supervisor Trey Adkins on 82 counts. Yuma County Arizona announced that “as of March 2022 their office had 16 open voting and registration investigations, and outlined four types of election fraud they have identified in Yuma County: impersonation fraud, false registrations, duplicate voting, and fraudulent use of absentee ballots.”
This is only the beginning. True The Vote will be releasing ALL of its data to the public soon in what’s named Operation Ripcord . County sheriffs and Attorney generals need only assess gathered evidence for criminality then follow up with arrests, indictments and trials which could be thousands. Ironically their own cellphones and the state placed video cameras already recorded every aspect of their crime. Those indicted will reveal who paid them, all the way to presumably George Soros and others. This must happen to prevent election fraud going forward.
Game over. Now no reasonable viewer can deny his own eyes. The documentation is as good as it gets and would stand up in any real court when presented; probably as good as needed for convictions of 90% of those presently incarcerated. “2,000 Mules” is the electoral smoking gun.
“2,000 Mules” is a must watch video for every American who values liberty. A free government requires a free press and an informed participating public. A media that censors information or puts together, “the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American Politics,” as Biden admits doing, is not free.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
In no school massacre was an officer of the law on the scene in time to stop the first killing. But one person always is—a teacher or staff member. If but one faculty or staff in the room, or close by, had a concealed weapon to defend their students and themselves and did so, school massacres would mostly vanish for the same reason the Uvalde, Texas Police Department stood down. Reportedly, they were afraid. This is the most reasonable solution to potential school massacres.
How do I know with certainty that this is the most reasonable solution. Because the teacher is likely to be in the room when a shooter arrives and also his first victim. Thus he /she has two motives that ensures his/her action: self-preservation and the preservation of the students he knows and is responsible for. No policemen has a greater motivation to action than this teacher.
54% of Voters Support Arming School Staff
Years ago a gunman entered a classroom in a high school immediately adjacent to the college where I was teaching and opened with a 12 gauge shot gun on two classmates that for years had bullied him. The first was wounded severely but survived, the second he missed. Both schools, the high school and the college next door, went into immediate lockdown.
In my college classroom, as in most, there was but one door, which opened outwardly and could be locked only from the outside. Everyone inside, including me the professor, has been set up by his own government and school board to be a victim. If this were the assailants first classroom no one could possibly get to the door in time to lock it from the outside.
For years my only defense was to ask students sitting on the door side of the room, upon hearing gunfire from outside the room, to lineup next to the wall, remove the fire extinguisher from the wall next to the door that opens outwardly, and spray or hit the intruder as he enters. Those behind him then were to overwhelm the intruder after the distraction, but this is all that we could do and it likely would not be enough. Since my students were adults this could work with a lot of luck. Again, if we were a killer’s first classroom such is actually a “free kill zone.”
In a college that refused to be a gun free zone a teacher or other adult with a concealed weapons permit, need only pull out a weapon from pocket or purse and fire a couple of rounds at a very surprised—then very dead—potential killer saving several minutes (in the case of Robb Elementary School in Uvalde Texas, over an hour) of indiscriminate slaughter. Instead, 19 children and 2 adults were killed while up to 19 law enforcement agents declined to enter.
But in a grade school fewer adults are in the room to save all. Still, if but one armed concealed weapons permit holder, had been in the classrooms or close by, a custodian, a secretary, a parent assisting the teacher, he/she could have saved up to 21 lives. This is the reason shooters prefer grade schools—no real resistance.
Why not have employee permit holders do so on school grounds as well, allowing them to be an asset of protection wherever they are? They are on the scene, care for their students, are a trusted profession in society, and, most importantly, are themselves threatened. It would cost the school little or nothing. Chances are every school has several concealed weapons permit holders among its faculty and staff already. Again, why not let those who wish to protect their students do so?
This is not to suggest that every teacher must participate—only those who wish to. Hundreds of regular permit holding citizens in my previous county in California, already carried concealed weapons permits, as did I, everywhere except in gun free zones (others call “free kill zones”). Such is the same in most counties throughout the nation. Law enforcement normally see permit holders as an asset, the ultimate backup should they need extra help, and also because cops know they can’t be everywhere at the same time, as some Uvalde, Texas residents learned the hard way. Why not let them be an asset of protection wherever they are; on school grounds as well? Some, like myself, would gladly participate in protecting those whom they serve.
Permit holders are among our finest citizens. Obtaining a concealed weapons permit requires a thorough investigation, a near perfect record from law enforcement, sometimes a stated need to carry, and some training. Normally they are older more mature folks and, in the case of teachers, society already trusts their young people to them several hours a day. They are already on the scene where a policeman could not possibly be. What a deterrent to a would-be killer if he knew schools are not so vulnerable.
Why not tell him so with a sign at every approach to the campus and every office door, in large print? “ATTENTION Please Be Aware that the Staff at (your school name) May Be Armed And Will Use Whatever Force is Necessary to Protect Our Students” ( X22 Reports, EP. 2784B, May 26, 2022, 23:00). School shootings would mostly vanish.
Gun free zones clearly do not work as most massacres in the United States happen in them and law breakers do not care about the law. Anticipating no resistance, rather than deter, they entice killers giving them access to large groups of unprotected and innocent victims—usually children.
Most gunmen ceased their killing rampage only when confronted with another gun. It takes a gun to stop a gun. Next time have that person be a teacher or staff member with a concealed weapon, and a vested interest in his and the safety of those around him, whose immediate action would allow so many more students to live. Only a few need to be armed. Assailants do not know who is, thus behave as though everyone is. Like the Uvalde police, they “don’t go in because they do not want to be shot.” The real solution to school massacres is already on campus.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Elon Musk to Twitter, “My offer [to purchase] was based on Twitter’s SEC filings being accurate. Yesterday Twitter’s CEO publicly refused to show proof of 5%. This deal cannot move forward until he does.” It is illegal for Twitter to have more than 5% fake accounts. Is Twitter really 90 million account strong or perhaps half that? Twitter is backed into a corner. Are they hiding the ballooning of their accounts, buyer must know? Think about the advertisers and shareholders who base their advertising expenses and shareholding profits upon precise, not fake, information. If not accurate Twitter could collapse under their own illegal behavior (X22 Reports, Ep. 2777B, May 17, 2022, 15:50).
We are all communists at Twitter!! They call it Commie-fornia!
Enter Siri Murugesan, Twitter senior engineer caught on camera by ProjectVeritas speaking of Elon Musk, the individual above attempting to purchase Twitter to promote free speech. “He’s a capitalist and we [Twitter] weren’t really operating like capitalists, more like very socialists. Like we’re all like commies [Communist] as f**k. Ideologically, it does not make sense like, because we’re actually censoring the right, and not the left. So, everyone on the right wing will be like, ‘bro’. It’s okay to say it, just gotta tolerate it. The Left will be like, ‘No. I’m not gonna tolerate it. I need it censored or else I’m not gonna be on the platform.’ So, it [Twitter] does that on the right. It’s true, there is bias. I don’t know [if] the two parties can truly co-exist on one platform. Like we’re all commie as f**k. Twitter does not believe in free speech. Our jobs are at stake. They hate it. Oh, My God!!! I’m at least like okay with it. But some of my colleagues are like super left, left, left, left, left. You’re there and its commie. They call it Commie-fornia. They’re like, ‘this would be my last day if it. Happens’” (Project veritas.com /Brave Twitter Siru Murugesan).
A Twitter engineer just admitted his organization, and those working there, are as Communist as they can be and Twitter is fully infiltrated. He also admitted that they do not support free speech but are totally engaged in censoring the right.
In another Project Veritas exchange a twitter executive says, “that Twitter is not here to give people free speech.” To which Elon Musk, who is purchasing Twitter to allow on it free speech, tweeted back, as though surprised with the revelation, “Twitter exec. trashing free speech?”
This should shock every American. No platform is more influential in shaping social media and the political opinions of Americans than Twitter, but if it is all socialist propaganda, distortion and lies how can it be trusted? And they freely admit this. Honest people have allowed Twitter to help form their perception of the world.
Normies, those who do not think or question deeply, may have been conditioned for many years by Twitter to accept socialism—begging many questions. What if most of what Twitter called disinformation, was, instead, true? What if the Democrats want the country overrun by illegal immigrants? What if the Left really is attempting to destroy the economy, the Constitution, the country and freedom? What if the vaccine was politicized? What if the 2020 presidential election really was stolen? What if the Democrats are the real racists? What if Twitter was instead a propaganda outlet for the Great Reset and World Government? Normies must now ask themselves these and other questions.
What if what Donald Trump said is true? “Our children are being indoctrinated, our values are being desecrated, our heritage is being obliterated, and our country is being humiliated by a president who has no idea what the hell is going on.” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2747B—[F} Black sites are being closed, Irregular Warfare, A Critical Moment in Time, April 10, 2022, 6:20).
Elon Musk is walking back his long-association with the Democrat Party. “In the past I voted Democrat, because they were (mostly) the kindness party. But they have become the party of division and hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican. Now watch their dirty tricks campaign against me unfold.” He predicted, “attacks on me will escalate dramatically in coming months.” He did not have to wait long, his company Telsa Inc was removed from its S & P 500 ESG Index (X22 Reports, Ep. 2778B—Conspiracy No More, Treason at Highest Levels, It’s a Marathon not a Sprint, May 18, 2022, 15:10).
Sure enough within a day or two came the left’s playbook sexual harassment charge. A woman wanting $250,000, claimed to have been solicited by him during a massage. He responded “describe just one thing, anything at all, (scars, tattoos, …) that isn’t known by the public. She won’t be able to do so because it never happened” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2780—May 20, 2022, 18:20).
Finally, if a large portion of Twitter’s accounts turn out to be fake instead of the accepted 5%, will its value plummet like crazy? Shouldn’t it!?! What about YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and others? Are they also deceiving their advertisers and shareholders? Maybe the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ought to audit these companies as well? If so, will corrupt platforms, pretending to be more popular than they are, experience a domino effect going down?
Perhaps they too share the same Commie-fornia leftist bias. And if Twitter became the mouth piece of the left, perhaps the others have also. If so, maybe we all should say, “I was surrounded by deceit, why could I not have seen?” Most importantly, had these platforms served as a myriad of voices, a choir to deceive me, what do I still believe that is not true?
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
So what would happened if Roe v. Wade where overturned? The issue would go back to the states where it was prior to 1973, and constitutionally belongs—the federal government would, as before, have no jurisdiction over the issue. It was taken from them in violation of Amendment 10, where all power resides other than that given to the federal government in Article I, Section 8, as we described in my recent column, “The Word Abortion has never been in the Constitution.” Finally, Planned Parenthood would receive no federal allocations so their extermination centers would largely disappear.
According to the Guttmacher Institute there are 13 states that have banned most or all abortions. These are: Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, N. Dakota, Oklahoma, S. Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming. Five additional states have a preexisting Roe v. Wade abortion ban on the books that would probably be reactivated. These are Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, W. Virginia and Wisconsin. Yet another four states currently have laws banning abortion after the six-week mark which presently have been ruled unconstitutional but probably would be reversed if Roe was overturned. Finally, another four states Florida, Indiana, Montana and Nebraska appear likely to ban or severely restrict abortion if Roe is overturned “based upon current legislative effort.” [X22 Reports, Ep. 2767B—Much to be Revealed Renegade Panicking, The Deal Keeps Iran Quiet, Control lost. May 4, 2022].
Twenty six states, over half of America, are likely to abandon abortion as an acceptable alternative to birth control. It is increasingly difficult to make the babies pay for their right to exist when they have a heartbeat at six weeks old. The stain and stench of innocent blood is in the practice and cannot be hidden anymore.
“I could give money specifically to abort a black baby”.
Then too, revelations of genocide by Planned Parenthood in Idaho against black babies turns the stomachs of Christian and moral people. Project Veritas caught on tape a Caller’s question, “What about abortions for under aged minority groups? The PP Employee: “Certainly and showed a willingness to accept larger donations to abort black babies!” “Caller: We just think …You know… the less black kids out there the better. PP Employee: (laughs) Understandable! Understandable!”
Abortion is the Democrat Parties sacred cow. Virtually all Democrats look the other way (a form of approval) of the genocide of their own unwanted or inconvenient humankind. If racism and eugenics have merged with the party, as appears so in the conversation above to “kill off segments of the population,” such is unacceptable in any society. Reportedly 79% of planned parenthood clinics are in minority neighborhoods. ([X22 Reports, Ep. 2767B, May 4, 2022, 27:00). Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger certainly supported eugenics of black babies.
This prompted Candace Owens to say, “If it wasn’t for the abortion industry, the black population would be virtually doubled today.” (Tucker Carlson). Let that sink in. If blacks ever come to recognize that they have been the targeted race of white democrats for black eugenics, the Democratic Party would cease to exist overnight and Planned Parenthood facilities would be burned to the ground nationwide by them.
“If it wasn’t for the abortion industry, the black population would be virtually doubled today.”
Another dark secret seems to be festering in Ukraine already seen as the Deep State laundering capital of the world for dark money, bioweapons labs, illegal drugs and etc. JuliansRum posed the question, “Where do all these aborted baby body parts go? And follows up with Ukraine as a “baby maker” operation. He asks: “Why is Ukraine at the world’s forefront of fetal stem cell therapies? —The first fetal stem cell treatment in humans occurred at the National Medical University of Ukraine. —The world’s first center to use fetal stem cells for therapeutic purposes in humans was founded in Kyiv, Ukraine. —The world’s first ever fully licensed fetal stem cell bank was in Ukraine. —The world’s largest fetal stem cell therapy clinic (EmCell) is in Ukraine. Stem cell anti-aging therapy is big biz there.” He ends with the observation that “Ukraine has become the self-styled stem cell capital of the world” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2767B—May 4, 2022).
BBC News was the first news outlet to give focus to Ukrainian research in the area, (“Ukraine Babies in Stem cell probe,” BBC News , by Matthew Hill, BBC Health Correspondent, Dec. 12, 2006). The column hypothesized, “There is heated debate about the ethics of using stem cells. Healthy new-born babies may have been killed in Ukraine to feed a flourishing international trade in stem cells, evidence obtained by BBC suggests.” The report “describes a general culture of trafficking of children snatched at birth, and a wall of silence from hospital staff upwards.”
Why Ukraine? For the same reason 13 bio-weapons labs existed there. The Deep State is the Ukrainian government and is unregulated in its dark science and dark money. Ukraine appears to be the world’s Deep State playground for activities that civilized nations would never permit such as “gain of function research” on human killer diseases and/or stem cell “research on live human cells.” Far fetched perhaps, but that is what they said about the “non-existent” bio-weapons labs before Putin took them out—something no longer seriously disputed. Conspiracy theories have a history of becoming conspiracy realities when enough money is attached.
So what would happen to abortion if Roe v. Wade where overturned? Almost anything from returning the issue to the states in accordance with Amendment 10, to deeper revelations about eugenics on blacks in America, to even darker revelations of stem cell research to preserve the youth of rich, old people—all positive for ending the darkest chapter in world history. Frankly, I believe America is tired of the guilt and shame which always accompanies the practice.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Put bluntly Democrats support extermination of their own unwanted kind and Republicans went along with it because it was a form of birth control. Two issues have forced a wider gulf on abortion than ever: 1) science has shown a fetal heartbeat at six weeks of pregnancy and 2) many taxpayers oppose funding extermination clinics of their own human kind. A strict interpretation of the Constitution would not have allowed either. The word abortion has never been in the Constitution, in 1973, or now.
Many who work in Planned Parenthood centers admit that perhaps 80% of what they do is exterminate unwanted humans. This is not family planning; it is instead the destruction of the family. Nor are such centers primarily for women’s health unless you can argue that pregnant women are unhealthy because they are pregnant. Abortion is not healthcare.
If women’s health were the “real” issue, redistributing Title X grants to non-Planned Parenthood facilities would better serve vastly more women and more of their health concerns. But funding extermination centers remains the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood.
Since Roe v. Wade we have aborted 63,776,644. in the U.S (http://www.numberofabortions.com/). A review of abortion pictures on the Internet often show tiny human body parts separated from the whole body when a scalpel was used to cut up the body making it easier to expel.
Abortion would not be a federal issue if both political parties followed the listed limits of federal power in the Constitution as designed. Again, the word abortion is not found in the Constitution, nor inferred, and no new amendment to the Constitution has been added moving it from a state power—Amendment 10 (where all powers not specifically identified in the Constitution as federal reside)—to a federal prerogative.
Without extreme, constitutional perversion to original intent the Supreme Court cannot rule, as it did in Roe v. Wade in 1973, in such a way as to create new law in an area where no federal law first existed or was subsequently added by way of a constitutional amendment. That no constitutional authority ever existed for Roe v. Wade in the first place, even less exists to extend that travel direction today.
Article 1, Section 8 lists federal powers. This clause divides all federal power into the four following areas: to tax, pay debt, provide for the general welfare and common defense. So as to restrict the federal government from enlarging its power, which is its natural tendency to do, the last two grants of power of the four each had an additional eight clauses giving clarity to what was meant by general welfare (clauses 2-9) and common defense (clauses 10-17). Outside these qualifiers the federal government has NO power to tax, spend, legislate, administrate or adjudicate. None!!
Even with the clarification of the list, states fearing that the federal government might still like to grow at their expense, refused to ratify the Constitution without additional restrictions harnessing it more fully to the enumerated powers, hence the Bill of Rights. These end with the federal handcuffs of Amendment 10: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The problem with the federal government going off the list and funding or assuming powers clearly not on it is that each time it does so—even once—the stronger the inclination to do so again. One minor departure begets another until one notices that what the federal government does has little or no relationship to the list. The result, in this case, is that mothers, encouraged by their federal government, exterminated over 60 million of their own; about ten times the number of Jews killed in the Nazi holocaust death camps, now so universally condemned.
But a fake connection to the Constitution was not the only fake part of Roe v. Wade. Jane Roe, Norma McCorvey, “AKA Jane Roe.” the plaintiff in the landmark 1973 case that legalized abortion in America was fake also. In the mid-1990s, McCorvey made a public religious and political conversion. “She was baptized on television in a backyard swimming pool; she wore overalls and came out beaming. She declared herself newly pro-life and spent the last two decades of her life crusading against the ruling her own case had made possible.” She announced “to the camera with an oxygen tube dangling from her nose” and told director Nick Sweeney, “This is my deathbed confession.”
“She never really supported the antiabortion movement,” she told Sweeney, in a scene filmed in 2017. “I took their money and they put me out in front of the camera and told me what to say, and that’s what I’d say.” “It was all an act?” the director asked. “Yeah,” she says. “I was good at it, too.” In fact, she had never had an abortion either. “By the time the Supreme Court handed down its decision, she’d been forced to carry out her pregnancy; the child had already been adopted” (Jane Roe, May 20, 2020, Washington Post, “‘Jane Roe,’ from Roe v. Wade, made a stunning deathbed confession. Now What? By Monica Hesse, May 20, 2020 New documentary ‘AKA Jane Roe’). Still, even a deathbed confession has some value But her story is a part of the deceit and national blood stain that surrounds this issue.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Ten prominent speakers in white coats representing 18,000 physicians and scientists rail against the CDC, NIH, WHO and the deep state press for their lies, censorship, and suppression of their science and their work with COVID-19. Still, this too was mostly censored by the controlled press.
Tens of thousands gathered in Los Angeles April 10 2022, to hear America’s most prominent COVID physicians and scientists rail against the CDC, The NIH, The WHO, the deep state press, the World Economic Forum and the federal and state governments for the censorship and suppression of their science and their work with COVID. Under the name Unity Project they began “We stand before you today with 18,000 doctors and scientists that we are representing—18,000!!! A banner declared, “There is No Emergency,” (it could have added “and there never was!) “and on each side of the stage, “Defeat the Mandates!” Media censorship prevailed and the people were denied knowing what the COVID experts now know. But unless removed, video of this event can be found at https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/04/there-is-no-emergency-dr-robert-malone-and-the-frontline-doctors-lay-down-the-real-facts/.
Ten prominent scientists and/or physicians spoke. All with the same prominent theme said by each differently referring to the above named organizations as having deliberately and knowingly lied. “It’s the policies that resulted in the carnage and the deaths of hundreds of 1000s of Americans. It was the policy—not the disease. It’s been said we know they are lying. They know they are lying. We know they know they are lying, but they’re still lying, and we got to stop that!!” There existed unanimity among them. Space allows coverage of only five of the ten.
All agreed on the above and the following: “We know masks do not work. We know the vaccine does not work. We know that social distancing does not work. We know that locking our people down does not work. We know that masking our children has such a profound effect on their development.” The children was a powerful area of unanimity, “keep your children away from this. The shot [has]no benefit for the children. If anybody puts their shot in the arm of a child it is plain and simple child abuse.” No science supports children needing this.
Richard Urso, MD, Founder of the Global COVID Summit, spoke of three additional prominent lies: 1) “there’s no early treatment for COVID,” 2) “natural immunity still needs a vaccine,” and 3) “every man, woman and child in the United States need a vaccine,”—each of which is not true. “In England and Scotland, where the data is not corrupted, the triple vaxxed account for 90% of the deaths.” Regarding the lipid nanoparticle in the vaccine, “It goes everywhere, brain, bone marrow, ovaries. It does not stay in the arm.” Dr. Urso noted four things it IS doing. “It’s blocking cancer repair mechanisms. It’s blocking receptors that lead to activation of dormant viruses. It’s producing spike protein for up to 60 days because the body doesn’t know what to do with the artificial pseudo yurodine. It’s going into DNA and reverse transcribing liver cells experimentally.” It is responsible for “40% more deaths between the ages of 18 and 64. There are 82% more deaths between the ages of 25 and 44.”
Ryan Cole, MD, Board Certified pathologist, “It is a collusion of the largest media companies, social media companies to obscure the truth from you. What do they do? They lie to you. How do they do it? Through propaganda and censoring the smartest doctors in the world because they don’t want you to know the truth. They are responsible for death, for despair, for social devastation. They have committed crimes against humanity and blood is on their hands. How?—By withholding information on early treatments to strengthen natural immunity, the side effects of the death jabs.”
Continuing, “We know the shot doesn’t prevent you from getting the virus. It doesn’t prevent you from carrying the virus. It doesn’t prevent you from transmitting the virus. It doesn’t prevent you from getting the disease. And in some cases, it doesn’t prevent you from dying from the disease. So is it a vaccine? No, of course it isn’t.” In fact, “The shot is worse than the virus itself now.” He suggests “it could cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.” Adding, “They want your body to be a toxin factory.”
Other countries have awakened. “The CDC in Europe said no more boosters. Israel, they said no more shots. We made mistakes, no passports, no boosters.…Oops, but at least they admitted it.” He ended, “The policy based on bad science is over, the real science is in and it’s in front of you. Freedom and liberty are what works. I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, Co-founder and President Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, one of the world’s leading experts in the clinical use of Ivermectin for COVID. He spoke of developing “the most effective treatment protocol in the world….And I know we’ve saved lives.” We have needless death. “The pharmaceutical industry is killing people. They do not care. They put profits ahead of people’s lives. They do this rapaciously, relentlessly and they’re doing it today.” He added, “I’ve been in ICUs for 15 months with lungs whited out, people dying on ventilators, families crying, families getting destroyed and they are all needless deaths. I know this early treatment works.”
Bryan Tyson,MD, has treated over 10,000 COVID patients successfully, probably more than anyone. He thought his success might result in positive publicity, but the media seemed not to want stories of success. But doctors using early treatment and existing drugs known to work, like HCQ and Ivermectin, have succeeded saving millions.
Paul Marik, MD, World Renowned Critical Care Specialist, “We know early treatment could have saved millions of lives! Millions of lives!!” Why did the organizations mentioned above resist the real science? Because “they want to instill fear and then want you to be admitted to the hospital where you are imprisoned and treated with Remdesivir which is a drug which kills people.” This is why the doctors and scientists are railing against the COVID lies and censorship.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
