President Donald Trump ignited the birthright citizenship issue by an executive order mandating that we return to the Constitution as written by ending the practice. His EO was titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.” Consequently 22 Democrat state AG’s sued the Trump Administration (PRESIDENTIAL ACTIONS Executive Order, Jan. 20, 2025). Generally Republicans agree with this action and many Democrats do not. A ruling accepting or rejecting this practice is expected by the Supreme Court any day.
All Deep State media quoted only the message they wanted remembered highlighted in yellow, knowingly leaving out the eligibility requirement of six words essential to the amendment “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Amendments 13, 14, and 15 were created to incorporate the newly freed ex-slaves in the South. None of these amendments had anything to do with immigration or contained even the word yet some Democrats saw this group as a way of supersizing to a permanent single party rule, thus encouraged this serious PERVERSION of the Constitution.
The post Civil War amendments all dealt with what to do with the former slave residents the North had made free against the will of the South; the 11 states once holding them in bondage, and although now free, wanted to keep them as still subservient in citizenship and voting. The 13th Amendment was ratified December 6, 1865, constitutionally ended slavery, the 14th on July 9, 1868) giving their yet unborn citizenship, and the 15th on March 30, 1870 extending the right to vote—together they equalized ex-slaves by law. The amendments must be treated together. None had anything to do with immigration—the word was not mentioned or implied.
Actually, birthright citizenship is prohibited by the 14th Amendment. LibertyUnderFire.org published on Sept. 28, 2010, “Are ‘Anchor’ Babies Constitutional?,” and we have followed with several like columns over the many years. The concept of “anchor” babies refers to those whose parents are illegal immigrants into the United States and while here have a baby. That baby then inherits full citizenship and even the right later, as an adult, to sponsor his/her own illegal parents in their quest for citizenship. How can a child of such a parentage have what his parents clearly do not have? Is this practice constitutional? No, and although miss-practiced widely the last several decades, has never been original intent or practice.
For the casual reader the amendment seems to validate such if we omit the middle highlighted six words : “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” The debate for or against the practice of allowing citizenship for babies of illegal’s born in the U.S. rages on with virtually no expert or otherwise going to the source of the alleged authority—the crafters of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Senator Jacob Merritt Howard, architect of the 14th Amendment, actually structured the Amendment, (one of two defining the legal status of freed slaves after the Civil War, the other being the 13th which gave them freedom) to prevent that very interpretation. He wrote: “This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and [already, as were ex-slaves] subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. THIS WILL NOT, OF COURSE, INCLUDE PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES WHO ARE FOREIGNERS, ALIENS [emphasis added], who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” It was he who insisted that the qualifying phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” be inserted into Section I. Those sneaking across our borders in the cover of darkness (under Biden in open daylight) are clearly foreigners and thus specifically excluded from automatic citizenship. Notice the exclusion of babies born of ambassadors while here too.
The early record of Senate deliberations on the 14th Amendment show this to be the view of the Senate. There is no such thing as automatic citizenship from this amendment without serious and unscholarly distortion of it. In fact, Lyman Trumbull, co-author of the 13th Amendment outlawing slavery, addressing the definition of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” asked, What do we mean by complete jurisdiction thereof? Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.” Those crossing our borders illegally have jurisdiction or allegiance elsewhere and thus cannot have automatic citizenship—nor can their babies.
On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens born in the U.S. The text of the order states that it applies only to newborns. It is not retroactive for people who are already U.S. citizens. According to a lawsuit filed by virtually every Democrat state AG in the country, there are about 150,000 children born each year to two parents who are illegal aliens. How can a child of such a parentage have what his parents clearly do not have? Trump wants to return to Amendment 14 which denied this practice.
Citizenship was denied Native Americans until 1924 as they owed allegiance to their Sioux or Apache or Blackfoot, or whatever, Indian nations and thus were not yet “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” of the nation they lived within. Certainly one must cease to be at war or conflict with the conquering country. So just being on U.S. soil, even all their life as were they, did not make them citizens automatically until the “jurisdiction thereof” part of the Amendment was satisfied.
Many of our Mexican friends send portions of their paychecks home to Mexico and plan to return to their native land upon retirement with pensions and/or social security sent to their “first” country from the country they extracted the wealth from—the U.S. Some vote in Mexican elections from here. It is indeed hard to argue that they are not instead subject to the jurisdiction of another land other than the United States—and most admit it. Unfortunately for them the U. S. Constitution specifically denies such citizenship.
Democrat AG’s from 22 states are now taking Trump to court for this “long-standing right.” This is likely to progress to the Supreme Court where it will be defeated if the court holds to original intent as understood and practiced for at least the first hundred years of the amendment’s history. No new amendment is needed to get us back to original intent. Trump’s executive order on this matter is within his authority and enough. Only ignorance, or intent, took us off the Constitution to begin with. It remains the law of the land as written. Only the grossest distortion or intent by those in power and a population grossly ignorant of their founding document could miss this. The president swears by oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” which, in this case, he is doing.
Either the Supreme Court follows the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, or it doesn’t! Justices, if you fail to uphold the Constitution on one of the clearest amendments written, you will lose the confidence of the people that you are fit for your high, Holy and distinguished office.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. Read more of his weekly columns @ www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #867
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
A newspaper editor once wrote me of the difficulty in finding a columnist expressing the constitutional viewpoint. I was impressed that he was making his way through the Federalist Papers and considered it a good read. Few today can identify what it is or how it came about. Today the Federalist Papers would be too deep a read for most college students—even many law school students. But it houses the thought processes and debates behind the Constitution, the document that caged the natural tendencies of government more than any governing document in world history. An understanding of the Constitution without this resource is not possible. And because the Constitution is based upon natural law, which does not change, it applies in all generations and in all societies. Likely not one in 20 today can defend the Constitution. from this perspective.
Because the Constitution is based upon natural law, which does not change, it applies to all generations, times, and societies. People immigrating from whatever form of government or environmental condition, benefit under this document. That has always been a major reason they come. Natural law begets freedom environments, which beget incentive environments, which begets creativity, which begets tools that enhance prosperity. Also, few nations of the world did not emulate parts of the Constitution. Likely, not one in 20 today can defend the Constitution. This is even less common from the natural law perspective.
Constitutional principles were once taught at every level of education and stories of the sacrifice of our Founders frequently recited with admiration. Today few schools teach these principles in grade school and fewer still in high school. In college U.S. History and Political Science classes the Constitution is tucked in the back of textbooks as an appendix, hence few actually read it. The history of the Constitution’s origin is housed in a chapter but constitutional principles seemingly have only informational value.
Some colleges or universities have courses on the Constitution for political science majors but almost, without exception, students are not required to actually read it, heavy emphasis is given instead to case law. Hillsdale College, and independent professors may be the only exceptions. The same is true in law school. Original intent is hardly mentioned. Law schools provide our attorneys and our judges, most with too little, on original intent. One rogue Supreme Court decision can effectively destroy large chunks of the Constitution and almost no one notices or cares. Too few understand that the Supreme Court is not the supreme law of the land over the Constitution. The Founders would have never permitted nine justices to destroy foundation principles. Sadly, I never met one having a Ph. D. in U.S. History or Political Science who, to get the degree, actually was required to read the U.S. Constitution in full. Nor have I met a lawyer having to do so. Case law yes, loads of it, but not the Constitution in full or natural law upon which it is based.
My point, if colleges give no emphasis to constitutional study how can we expect the student to do so either? Many years ago U.S. News and World Report reported a study showing that most Americans could not pass the constitutional questionnaire for citizenship, so constitutionally illiterate are we. This document is only of minimal value to journalism or communication majors as well. But these professions serve as information filters in our newspapers, magazines, radio, television news programs, or in social media, even podcasts as well.
The media has divided citizens into two warring camps liberals and conservatives, lumping constitutionalists and libertarians with conservatives and pretends there exists no other viewpoints. Rarely is original intent allowed into the discussion as in The Federalist Papers. Thus a liberal moves further, faster from original intent than a conservative but both still move away although at different speeds until the liberal no longer cares if the grant of power is constitutional or not, which is where we are today. Until then both maintain the constitutionality of their position by the latest perversion, or a combination of perversions, to justify the recent perversion. And each perversion of original intent invites another until after a period of time the ending perversion no longer resembles the original grant of power thus authority is essentially manufactured out of thin air. All maintain they follow the Constitution when neither has. Traditionally both major groups problem-solve primarily by increasing federal power without specific constitutional authority. If the document is properly understood this cannot be done without damaging the fabric of the document. A constitutional provision either CLEARLY grants the “over-reach” or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t we can’t pretend that it does. But the Constitution is the law of the land and all in authority swear by oath to preserve it.
Today the Federalist Papers would be too deep a read for most college students—even many law school students. But it houses the thought processes and debates behind the Constitution, the document that caged the natural tendencies of government more than any governing document in world history. An understanding of the Constitution without this resource is not possible.
Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter violated the Constitution with impunity as did both Bush presidents. The Tea Party movement, primarily constitutionalists, rose up in 2009 as much against George W. Bush, a conservative, as against the incoming president Barack Obama, a liberal. It used to matter if a president did not carefully follow the Constitution. Barack Obama, violated the constitution more than any president preceding him and Joe Biden more than Obama. In fact, there were few things that Biden did that were constitutional. Today both Democrats and Republicans defend their president routinely when he violates it. Donald Trump, not particularly a constitutionals, has followed it more closely than any previous president since Ronald Reagan —37 years ago. He also appointed three largely constitutionalist judges. These made the Court more fundamentalist then decades previous.
Of the two major political parties the Democrats rarely cite the document and seem almost contemptuous of it. In fact, most of what they propose is easily argued to be outside the Constitution. They used to defend major parts of the Bill of Rights but I do not see much of that anymore. Republicans sometimes carry the document on their person but do not hold to it and thus much of what they propose is also outside of the Constitution but they do use the word Constitution more than do Democrats, if that means much. This generation knows that the Constitution was a good thing, probably should be revered, at least historically, but they know little of the principles housed therein and have no idea how to vote to get back to it. Getting back to it is never considered. This they will never get from the media, political party, or currently, it seems, not even the institutions of learning—only private study.
That my new editor would find it difficult to find columnists that express the constitutional viewpoint is easily understood, as is the fact that newer columnists, lacking this understanding, are far more likely to express views in opposition to it. Constitutional illiteracy is almost universal to the point that those qualified to defend the Constitution as designed are becoming extinct. Students are not likely to defend it if they never experienced it being defended. A real danger exists that if too few know or value its principles we will lose it—perhaps we already have. Some say it is no longer relevant for our times. They are so wrong.
Dr. Harold Pease is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist on current events. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #863 Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
Before 1913, and for 137 years as a nation, the United States had no federal income tax. The expenses of the federal government were covered by tariffs assessed on goods from other countries wishing access to America’s market. Money flowed in externally from other countries. Thereafter, and today, the vast majority of federal expenses come internally out of the pockets of the American taxpayer. The federal government spends what it wants borrowed from a private income source called the Federal Reserve which must be repaid with interest for the use of their money, just like any bank. This is called the national debt which now exceeds 38 trillion dollars.
The heart of Trump’s Parallel Economic System is the tariff on goods from other countries wishing access to our markets —the same system used the first 137 years of our history as a nation until 1913. Tariff revenue soared in FY 2025 more than 240% from the year before moving to over 300% by October. The Deep State does not want a parallel system that competes with their monopoly through their Federal Reserve and will do everything in its power to destroy it. Thus far all signals are encouraging including the recent Supreme Court decision which actually only killed the weakest tariff law of the many long-standing strong ones.
President Trump knows this debt is not sustainable and a collapse is imminent. He is trying to restore the funding system that sustained the country for its first 137 years as a nation with no national debt. That system is today called the Parallel Economic System which we will switch back to when it can sustain us. It is getting stronger every month. The heart of this Parallel Economic System is the tariff on goods from other countries wishing access to our markets.
The Federal Reserve created in 1913 is the Deep States’ funding, enslaving and destroying entity. They intend we never be out of debt to them and taxpayers give to it a sizable portion of their income every year which seems never to decrease until they are safely dead. We want freedom from it. Until Trump it had no real resistance nor competition. The Deep State wishes to destroy Trump and his Parallel Economic System. No other president has tried to get free from the Federal Reserve. Trump knew that it would be opposed by all Deep State aligned and influenced politicians both Democrat and RINO.
Trump knew his return to tariffs as the principle source of income for federal expenses would be challenged. The Deep State wanted the Supreme Court to rule it unconstitutional to end the competition. Trump tricked them into using our weakest statute on tariffs so it, not the funding practice, could be sacrificed. It worked! After all, tariffs had Congressional approval throughout American history. If he lost the case it could be brought back using a stronger statute. The Court ruled he could not charge countries “even one dollar,” but his tariffs could be used to block a nations unwanted goods from entry. This was vastly more important and certainly suggested retaining tariffs (X22 Report hereafter not cited, Ep. 3845b, Feb. 22, 2026, 53:16).
The tariffs challenged are the ones using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) which is a federal law enacted in 1977 granting the president authority to counter unusual and extraordinary threats to national security without requiring congressional approval or extensive agency review. Because of its vagueness it became the “go to” authority for new tariffs more especially in a “hostile to Trump” Congress (combining Democrat/RINO opposition) becoming the majority in the U. S. Senate.
In the dissent ruling, Justice Kavanaugh encouraged Trump’s use of the other stronger statutes on tariffs going forward. In the 6 to 3 ruling Trump lost the use of this single act in establishing tariffs, not critical to their continued existence, but miraculously won the case to continue them with the minority vote. The need for tariffs was not damaged or even discouraged. The ruling made Trump’s use of tariffs in other statutes stronger. The Deep State tariff threat was vaporized.
On C-SPAN Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained, “The Court did not rule against President Trump’s tariffs. Six Justices simply ruled that IEEPA authorities cannot be used to raise even one dollar of revenue. This administration will invoke alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs.” (“On Tariffs and the Economy” Ep. 3845a, Feb. 22, 2026, 16:16).
Trump wrote, “Now the Court has given me the unquestioned right to ban all sorts of things from coming into our country, a much more powerful right than many people thought we had… But now I am going in a different direction, which is even stronger than our original choice. As Justice Kavanaugh wrote in his descent: ‘The decision might not substantially constrain a President’s ability to order tariffs going forward. This is because numerous other federal statutes authorize the President to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1952, Sec. 232, TheTrade Act of 1974, Sec. 122, Sec. 201, Sec. 301 and The Tariff Act of 1930, Sec. 338.”
Trump continued, “The Supreme Court’s decision today made a president’s ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and crystal clear rather than less. There will no longer be any doubt, and the income coming in and the protection of our companies and country will actually increase because of this decision. Based on long-standing law and hundreds of victories to the contrary the Supreme Court did not overrule tariffs, they merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA tariffs…In order to protect our country a president can actually charge more tariffs than I was charging in the past under the merits of a tariff authority which have also been confirmed and fully allowed.” Then he doubled down. “Therefore, effective immediately, all national security tariffs Section 232 existing, Section 301 tariffs remain in place and in full force and effect. Today I will sign an order to impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 over and above our normal tariffs already being charged” (Ep. 3845a, February 22, 2026, 19:04).
The ruling had a possible interesting side benefit. If it is true that “US consumers paid for 90% of IEEPA refunds —$120 BN— should go direct to consumers / firms. And with refund timing open-ended, they can be sent any time before midterms. Did the Court just give Trump the ability now to send everyone a $2,000 dividend check as he suggested last Fall, sometime before the 2026 midterm elections, this from tariff money (Ep. 3845b, Feb. 22, 2026, 48:03)? Perhaps!!
Trumps’ Parallel Economic System was not destroyed by the Deep State as intended and will continue to grow until it replaces the Federal Reserve as the funder of federal expenses as it once was for 137 years and possibly end our federal income tax as well. Wow!!
Dr. Harold Pease is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist on current events. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #861
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
Article VI of the Constitution is called the Supremacy Act for a reason. “Laws …made in pursuance thereof… shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby; …Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding…Members of the several state legislatures, and all executives and judicial officers, both of the United States, and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution.” Federal law trumps state law and sanctuary law does not constitutionally exist. Defiance against deportation and acts of aggression on ICE agents enforcing federal law is serious insurrection. As we have reported all conditions have been in place for the constitutional use of the Insurrection Act since April 28, 2025 (“First Day in Office Trump Prepared America for the Coming Insurrection,” Jan. 28, 2026, and “Trump Will Use The Insurrection Act When Coming Chaos Demands It,” Feb. 4, 2026, both LibertyUnderFire.org ).
Abraham Lincoln “We The People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” The elector, not elected officials or judges, are the ultimate authority. The oath every members of Congress pledges. “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same….” Trump is appealing to the elector. It was the right answer in Lincoln’s day and again in ours. We must remove all judges and legislatures who break their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. This could be at least a third of those in both houses of Congress.
Only 10 U.S.C. Section 334 of the longstanding laws of the land remained to trigger it’s use. The President must issue a proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse before deploying military force. It reads, “Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the Armed Forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgence to disperse and retire, peaceably to their abodes within a limited time. (See also, August 10, 1956, ch. 1041, section 1, 70A Stat. 16.).
For public awareness and confidence in its elected leadership, it is advisable to first prove that established and ordinary measures to gain compliance were first tried without success. For the remaining eight months of 2025, the administration attempted standard enforcement through “National Guard deployments under existing authority. October 4, 2025, Trump federalizes 300 Illinois National Guard members to protect ICE personnel in Chicago. Governor JB Pritzker files immediate legal challenge. Federal courts block deployment. Posse Comitatus restricts military involvement in domestic law enforcement. November 2025, Portland Judge issues permanent injunction against guard deployment in Oregon. December 23, 2025, The Supreme Court denies emergency relief in Trump vs Illinois.”
THE CORRUPT COURTS BLOCKED EVERYTHING but, more importantly, in doing so they established that “ordinary measures cannot succeed when states organize, systematic resistance. They certified that regular law-enforcement has become impracticable.” They documented the exact threshold that previously existing law 10 U.S.C. Section 332 required (The Insurrection Proclamation , EKO, January 5, 2026, pp. 4-7). It reads, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into federal service, such of the militia of any State and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.” The only way to stop their treasonist assault against the federal government is the Insurrection Act which allows the armed forces, not just the National Guard, to defend freedom and the Republic on American soil.
One ray of hope shown through the Trump vs. Illinois ruling, but was exactly what was needed. Justice Kavanaugh filed a brief consequential footnote: “One apparent ramification of the Court’s opinion is that it could cause the President to use the US military more than the National Guard.” Northwestern law professor Paul Gowder saw it for what it was and said, “This is basically an invitation for Trump to go straight to the Insurrection Act next time” (Ibid.). It opened the door to the only way to save the Republic. Trump saw it too and almost immediately pulled the Guard out of Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland. He would wait for constitutional judges.
Federal judges take two oaths before assuming their duties: the Constitutional oath, which requires them to support and defend the Constitution, and the judicial oath, which mandates that they administer justice impartially and fairly. The Constitution only created the Supreme Court but allowed “such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” They were created to preside judicially over a district, not the whole nation. Actually, Congress could dissolve the district courts to destroy the insurrectionists justices if it wanted to. These unsuccessfully tried to take over the executive branch by blocking every Trump executive order. President Trump uses a Sharpie pen to sign his executive orders, hence the pen is his sword in this cartoon.
Minneapolis came and mostly went, likely the worst exhibition of treason against the federal government since the Civil War but it was still just a few actually on the streets, plus the Deep State fake news hype, and only one state actively physically threatening ICE and deportations. They pushed Trump with everything they had because they wanted him to use his “ammunition,” The Insurrection Act, too early. No! He would threaten its use but the “big fish” Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden would never be prosecuted by their own appointed judges nor would George Soros, the insurrectionist’s lead funder. Nobody would go to prison.
The insurrection behind the scenes may be a hundred times bigger than that yet expressed on the streets of Minneapolis and the people are not yet convinced that they want real justice which has to include the death penalty for those found guilty of serious and intentional treason. He must wait to use the Insurrection Act until the anticipated insurrection climaxes and is mostly simultaneous—until everyone can see its intent is to overthrow the U.S. government, again. After all, their acts of insurrection are against “We the People,” the laws and sovereignty of the United States and its Constitution. Trump must wait even until the Insurrection Act’s use is demanded of him.
Both sides know that only one side can win this bout, socialism or freedom. The boil hast to burst and the most likely time is around the 2026 election. One side wants cities burning as in 2020 and their criminals, already incarcerated by local authorities, released into society rather than have them transferred peaceably to ICE custody, seemingly to maximize crime and chaos. The other side wants all insurrectionists rounded up, judged by judges loyal to the Constitution, and punished for their crimes or deported. If they return it must be through the front door only.
Presently Trump’s DHS is purchasing industrial warehouses in at least eight states to accommodate 23 large-scale detention centers for holding and deportation of at least one million illegal aliens annually (X22 Report, Ep. 3830b, Feb. 1, 2026,48:11). The Constitution requires it.
Dr. Harold Pease is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist on current events. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #859
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
As previously published Trump prepared the nation in 2025 for the coming use of the Insurrection Act of 1807; all constitutional requirements addressed. But it is not likely to be used until the public demands it, most likely around the 2026 election (“First Day in Office Trump Prepared America for the Coming Insurrection,” Jan. 28, 2026, LibertyUnderFire.org ). It has been used several times before and the military has been told they will have a role in its use.
Thomas Jefferson The Founding Father most responsible for both The Declaration of Independence and the Insurrection Act of 1807 and the first president to use the Act in 1808 against Aaron Bur. The Act’s predecessor was the Militia Act of 1792 used by George Washington enabling him to use state militias to protect federal interests on the frontier. The Insurrection Act of 1807 enlarged the authority to include as well use of the army and navy to curb insurrections. Over time some 14 presidents have used it including Abraham Lincoln. And in the last century Dwight D.; Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy. Most recently George H. W. Bush to curb the LA Riots of 1992. It and the Constitution are vintage documents time tested over the centuries.
But the time to use it nationally in sanctuary states and cities is not yet because of three reasons. (1) The Judicial coup d’état is still in place and no justice can be expected until corrupt judges, who do not follow the rule of law, are replaced with those who do, by impeachment this year by the House of Representatives and/or, failing that, because Deep State power is so entrenched, by the people in the election in November. Article II, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution requires this. It reads, “…All civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Insurrectionists members of Congress from both parties MUST be removed from office in state elections as well. This IS the 2nd American Revolution.
2) Under the Constitution insurrection is treason which allows the death penalty—punishment serious enough to make generations yet unborn not return to the practice of overthrowing their elected government by insurrection or coup d’état. Is society ready for firing squads? Finally, 3) Moving too fast until the public is ready for real justice may feed the insurrection against the established constitutional government now in power.
Thus far Congress has failed to curb the judicial insurrection with the Constitution therefore Trump must wait until enough of the people are awake to DEMAND the use of the Insurrection Act to save the Republic, the Constitution and liberty. Insurrection violence has awakened most of the people as the following Rasmussen questions and answers attest. This, despite the fact that the Deep State insurrectionists still control what is news, what is education, what is in encyclopedias, what is in AI, and what is social media—consequently what is portrayed as truth.
Consider the following Rasmussen poll questions and the public’s response to them. *“Do you approve or disapprove of the Trump Administration’s program to find and deport immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally? Approval was 62% of ALL voters and 60% of ALL races, even Democrats approved 42% (X22 Report not cited hereafter, Ep. 3820b, Jan. 18, 2026, 53:08). The people are looking behind the curtain and moving to Trump.
Other Rasmussen questions, *“How likely is it that non-citizens are illegally registered to vote in the state where you live? 32% very likely, 23% somewhat likely, for a total of 55% likely. *Should only US citizens be allowed to vote in US elections? Yes – ALL voters 85%, all categories 70% or higher, Democrats yes 81%, GOP: 87%.” *“Is requiring photo ID to vote a responsible measure to protect the integrity of elections? Yes, ALL voters 73%, all categories 67% to 86% (Rasmussen Reports, X22 Report, Ep. 3823b, Jan. 21, 2026,1:01:19 and 1:01:44). *“Would you support or oppose your state government doing an audit of voter registration and removing all non-citizens from the rolls? SUPPORT was 78% of ALL voters, Dems 66%, GOP 86% (Ep. 3824b, Jan 22, 2026, 1:05:55). The people are awake.
The Insurrection Act is two sentences long and has been needed and used by 14 presidents to suppress insurrections in this country for over 219 years. The first sentence may be hard to read in this copy of the original document. It reads, “AN ACT authorizing the employment of the land and naval forces of the United States, in cases of insurrections.” Only insurrectionists should fear it.
So why have Senate Democrats and RINOS not voted for the SAVE Act which would ensure all of the above that the people clearly want? Because “We the People” are NOT their constituents, the illegals and insurrectionists are. Congress could have removed the corrupt judges but have for at least five years refused to impeach them. All insurrectionists members of Congress, both Houses, regardless of political party, must be removed from office in their next election if we are to restore a Republic, the Constitution, and liberty. The polls show the people came to understand in 2025. In the next 11 months, if movement is similar to that of 2025, we may very well come to support treason trials, even the death penalty for some of the biggest names in the Democrat Party and some Republicans as well, particularly in Georgia.
Trump is waiting for a universal insurrection so the people know who the real traitors are and so all low level insurrectionists are on the streets so that they can be “rounded up” at approximently the same time (Ep. 3825b, Jan. 25, 2026, 2:20). The high level insurrectionist like George Soros are themselves never on the streets. He expects the insurrection to spread throughout the sanctuary cities of the nation in 2026 but he is prepared for use locally if places like Minneapolis get beyond manageable before time to use the Insurrection Act nationally. In January, before Gov.Waltz and Mayor Frey backed down, Trump had ready to go into Minneapolis “1,500+ 11th infantry on standby, 500+ military police on standby, 500+ Federalized National Guard OFR on standby, 3,000+ DHS/ICE agents on site, Undisclosed FBI/DOJ on site/en route” (Ep. 3825b, Jan. 25, 2026, 1:12:26). Trump will not use the Insurrection Act nationally until demanded.
Waltz called up his National Guard troops and had them wear “neon reflective vests to help distinguish them from other agencies who may be in similar uniforms.” This would have made no difference as Trump has the power to federalize state national guards and would have done so. They were oath bound to defend the Constitution and federal law when they joined the National Guard (Ep. 3825b, Jan. 25, 2026, 59:15). If they failed to stand by their oath their neon vests would have immediately identified them as the enemy and they too would have been rounded up.
The insurrectionists are showing themselves as the enemies of the Republic. Why destroy an enemy in the process of destroying itself. Stories of the two martyrs Renee Nicole Good and Alex Petti being innocent peaceful demonstrators were debunked within hours. Some few isurrectionists reportedly brought “their babies” to the “show.” Were they hoping to get a martyr if one were hurt or killed? Sick!
Trump will use The Insurrection Act when coming chaos demands it just like the 14 other presidents preceding him.
Dr. Harold Pease is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist on current events. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #858
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
Despite what we see in Minneapolis today justice is coming for the insurrectionists. At the moment it is scheduled for late Fall 2026, likely associated with the 2026 election. It will be clean and swift. Almost everything is in place for mass arrests. That preparation began January 20, a year ago on Inauguration Day just hours after Trump took the oath of office a second time. Trump’s Proclamation 10886 announced the reason. “America’s sovereignty is under attack. Our southern border is overrun by cartels, criminal gangs, known terrorists, human traffickers, smugglers, unvetted military-age males from foreign adversaries, and illicit narcotics that harm Americans.” He called it a four-year-long invasion that caused widespread chaos and suffering.
10 U.S.C. § 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority. “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.” The military will be supporting the Constitution and long established law.
Thus began the legal framework for issuing the Insurrection Act of 1807 which will be, the most important action of his presidency. It will save the Republic. It will save the Constitution. It is intended to remove the Deep State from over 100 years in power initially in both political parties and it should restore justice. But bringing the armed forces in to remove long standing treason requires following the Constitution in every detail—every t crossed and every i dotted. Trump did this in 2025 with respect to the coming insurrection. The framework is completed for use.
Getting Trump back into office was critical and a HUGH win for saving the Republic—but just the beginning. Had Harris / Waltz won in 2024 this would never have been done, the Republic would have been lost. Trump knew the Deep State intended both World War III with Russia over Ukraine and civil war between blue and red states in this country in 2025. Either event would cover over the crimes of the Deep State of the last 100 years. Joe Biden provoked both events. America became the lead funder of missile and drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia and encouraged the millions who invaded our southern border, those from overseas coming largely through Venezuela. LibertyUnderFire.org has published dozens of columns on these issues. Trump and Putin have made nuclear war with Russia unlikely and that war is destined to be the ninth conflict between nations resolved by Trump in his second term.
But the Deep State will not back off from creating, funding and provoking civil war by open insurrection between the federal government (through ICE) and sanctuary cities and states loaded with illegal, even criminal, aliens. Otherwise Deep State participants go to jail. Trump knows that sooner or later, likely this Fall, the Insurrection Act of 1807 will have to be used to save the Republic. That is precisely why he assembled the generals and admirals on Sept. 30, 2025 to Marine Corps Base Quantico, He told them, “This is going to be a big thing for the people in this room because it’s the enemy from within and we have to handle it before it gets out of control. It won’t get out of control once you’re involved” (“Trump Discloses to the U.S. Generals ‘The Enemy is From Within,”’ LibertyUnderFire.org,10 October 2025).
Using the Insurrection Act of 1807 required a national emergency as a base, Biden’s four-year unvetted invasion on our southern border of millions of illegals from countries around the world was that base. The invasion was visualized by every American on television every day and night. This included at least 24,000 military-aged men from communist China through Venezuela among the millions invading (“China is Invading America Without Firing a Shot. Biden Lets Them!!.” LibertyUnderFire.org ). Those not coming from central and south America came almost entirely through Venezuela. As mentioned Trump issued Proclamation 10886, on Inauguration Day January 20, 2025, which ended the Biden invasion.
Section 6(b) of that Proclamation required a joint report within 90 days on whether to invoke the Insurrection Act. That time period ended April 20, 2025 and eight days later, April 28, 2025, Trump issued Executive Order 14287 “Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens.” His national emergency declaration established crisis conditions. The 90-day clock resulting forced formal evaluation and the executive order provided the legal predicate for the eventual Insurrection Act. The clock ran the required 90 days (The Insurrection Proclamation, EKO, January 5, 2026, p. 3-4).
The fourth paragraph of Executive Order 14287 issued April 28 identified the heart of the issue, consider Minneapolis, Minnesota, sanctuary city and state, “this is a lawless insurrection against the supremacy of federal law” (The Insurrection Proclamation, EKO, January 5, 2026, p. 1-2 ). The federal government is obligated to defend the territorial sovereignty of the United States” as outlined in the Constitution Article IV, Section 4 which requires the federal government to “protect each of [the states] against invasion.” Simply, sanctuary jurisdictions are not now and never have been Constitutional because they create new governments within a state not authorized in the Constitution,— we already have counties and cities.
The laws established decades ago are very precise about insurrection and treason. I am a former political science college professor and am most concerned about the young students that have been blinded by the fake news and indoctrinating professors who have not taught them about these laws or about the Deep State. To the student I say, “You are playing with fire when you take on the federal government. You are NOT fighting for freedom. Sit this one out until you have all sides. You are signing up for one to twenty years in prison because of your ignorance. Please!!! I care! ICE is not your enemy. They are only enforcing the laws Congress passed.”
The executive order identified the offending actors as the Biden administration, international cartels, transnational criminal organizations and domestic terrorists. It described the unlawful conduct as those obstructing justice (18 U.S.C.1501 et seq.), unlawfully harboring or hiring illegal aliens (8 U.S.C. 1324), conspiracy against the United States (18 U.S.C. 371), and conspiracy to impede Federal law enforcement (18 U.S.C. 372), assisting aliens in violating Federal Immigration law could also violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. 1961et seq.). Executive Order 14287 was legal notification of their crimes.
The executive order also required the publishing and updating of a list of those obstructing justice within 30 days of the order which ended May 28, 2025. This compiled by both the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security notifying “each sanctuary jurisdiction regarding its defiance of federal immigration law enforcement and any potential violation of federal criminal law.” All have been notified that they are violating decades old established law.
Yes, Trump’s first day in office he prepared America for the coming insurrection, but it is not yet.
Dr. Harold Pease is an expert on the United States Constitution and a syndicated columnist on current events. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #857
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
