The term socialism has been around primarily in Europe since the early 1800s—with perhaps dozens of practicing groups. Adam Weishaupt, Baron Anacharsis von Clootz, Count Henri de Saint-Simon, Georg Wilhelm Hegel, David Friedrich Strauss, Bruno Bauer, and Ludwig Feuerbach, even Robert Owen in America, to name a few. Dozens more were expressing collectivist and/or atheistic doctrines long before Marx and Friedrich Engels brought forth the Communist Manifesto and finalized Das Kapital. Karl Marx is considered the godfather of the two most influential, dangerous, and successful forms of late 19th century socialism: International Communism and Fabian Socialism. The former gained power in Russia, the latter in Great Britain, each spreading outward from these two centers influencing neighboring countries. Total or near total regimentation is the goal of both, though the means of accomplishing this objective differ radically: the former orders violent revolution, the latter prescribes a diet of revolution by evolution—one piece at a time. Both work to establish a classless, socialistic, world society. One basic difference, Marx viewed the proletariat or working class as the essential revolutionary force while the Fabians insisted that the upper class was the more important revolutionary element. Both call themselves socialists.
The Berlin Wall, a remnant now a Monument, which once divided free West Germany from socialist East Germany lest future generations forget what socialism did to a once free Germany under Soviet socialist occupation. In the years between 1949 and 1961, about 2.5 million East Germans fled from East to West Germany. These wanted FREEDOM FROM SOCIALISM. The wall went up beginning August 12, 1961 and remained in place through October 1989 (28years). It was topped with barbed wire and guarded with watchtowers, gun emplacements, electrified fences, and mines. About 5,000 East Germans still managed to cross the Berlin Wall (by various means) and reach West Berlin, while another 5,000 were captured by East German authorities in the attempt and 191 more were killed during the actual crossing of the wall. The people were forced to remain under socialism.
Thus we can best define socialism by extracting what the philosophers of these two very successful socialist groups say that it is, rather than share what the variants of socialism, those that never conquered a single country, say that it is. Relying on them Webster’s Dictionary definition is found to be willfully incomplete. It reads: “Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or government ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.” Actually socialists seek to impact every element of society: law, morality, government, economics, religion and education—everything; not just the ownership and administration of the means of production. But Webster did correctly view it as “a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism….” They are first cousins, both know of, and work for a common goal—full communism.
The violent means of communism, as a form of socialism, is well known and now out of favor with most socialists outside North Korea since the fall of the United Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on December 26, 1991. Marx and Friedrich Engles being its doctrinaires, so we won’t need to write what is commonly known. Perhaps one citation is representative. Most are familiar with Marx’s strange love letter written to his prospective spouse, Jenny, before their marriage. Marx wrote: “Jenny! If we can but weld our souls together, then with contempt shall I fling my glove in the world’s face, then shall I stride through the wreckage a creator!” (Edmund Wilson, To The Finland Station: A Study in the Writing and Acting of History, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 1972, p. 136). Wreckage was an understatement! No philosophy resulted in more havoc on the earth’s surface than his. Marx died in 1883 but 34 years later, in 1917, Russia a non-capitalist society, adopted the violent revolutionary philosophy he prophesied.
So what did the Fabians say socialism was? In their published pamphlet Fabian Tract No. 4, “What Socialism Is,” George Bernard Shaw admitted, the publication contained “nothing that was not already to be found better stated in the famous Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels” (Shaw, The Fabian Society: Its Early History, pp. 3-5). The Fabian Society from the beginning has been clothed with respectability and since it “stressed programs instead of dogma and avoided conflict with the authorities its motives were not seriously questioned” (Rose L. Martin, The Selling of America, Fidelis Publishers & Company, 1973, pp. 5-6). The prescription then and now is simply to introduce piecemeal changes in existing concepts of law, morality, government, economics, and education such that the masses absorb the changes desired without resistance.
The enticement for socialism— free stuff— makes it infinitely easier to get into than out of, once trapped.
Norman Thomas, six time candidate for U.S. President on the Socialist Party ticket and a Fabian, described the formula even more bluntly. “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But, under the name of Liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until America will one day be a Socialist nation —without knowing how it happened.” (Two Worlds: The Story of Man and the Major Influences on His Life, A Flick-Reedy Education Enterprises Book, Bensenville, Illinois, 1966, p. 152). The quote has been attributed to Thomas for many decades but the exact first source is not known. Given his background, there is more reason to believe the quote credible, than to believe it was not made by him. Moreover, the quote is in complete harmony with socialist strategy followed historically.
Nor were the Fabians any less clear as to what their new world order would be like once fully implemented. Shaw, left no doubt with this very scary detail. “I also made it clear that Socialism means equality of income or nothing, and that under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well (George Bernard Shaw, Intelligent Women’s Guide to Socialism, Brentano’s Publishers, New York, 1928, p. 470). PERMITTED TO LIVE!?!
But this point was not the ravings of one man only but was basic Fabian doctrine. It was stressed as early as Oct. 1907 in Fabian Tract No. 113 “Communism” by William Morris, The Fabian Society, which read in part, “There would need indeed to be a natural compulsion, which would prevent any man from doing what he was not fitted for, because he could not do it usefully; and I need not say that in order to arrive at the wealth I have been speaking of, WE MUST ALL WORK USEFULLY.” In other words, your very right to exist was dependent entirely upon whether you were a profitable citizen and that determination was to be made by the government. In this respect socialism and communism differed little. Ultimately the use of force is basic to the Fabian new world order as it is to the communist utopia. Sounds like their Great Reset. “You will own nothing and be happy.”
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org. Column #889.
Share this column to help preserve liberty while we still can.
Democrats already know the GOP will win the midterms. Way last March 31 Pelosi announced Democrat plans to invalidate the coming November 3, 2026 BIG GOP win. Congresswoman Pelosi announced their plan was to concede nothing and oppose everything, especially in all battle ground states. They will begin by accusing Trump of manipulating the 2026 midterms. They will double down on this narrative to sow doubt in the Trump win because of its size.
The left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election. We were censored and information was censored from us, before and after the election. We were called “election deniers” and it was called a “conspiracy theory” with the same emotion as if these were foul words. Declassified documents show we were always right.
Pelosi told us that their optics of a false count will follow: “late night flipping, huge delays in reporting, precincts going to hand count. They intend to weaponize, sow doubt and delay results.” They will say, “The technology was compromised just like we worried. This is a false count! We demand forensic imaging of every tabulator.” They will “file suits under state emergency elections statute 2 USC Section 8 claiming the inoperability prevented a fair count.” They will “push for court ordered freezes on certification until safe manual audits are complete.” Blue states [will] “declare election integrity emergencies, extend canvassing windows and push results past the safe harbor deadline, December 11.” They are already five months into this narrative. “This drags official outcomes into January 2027 and beyond.” (X22 Report, hereafter not cited, Ep. 3873b, March 31, 2026, 55:00).
Of course, the GOP will win big because they spent the last 5 1/2 years exposing, then blocking, the fraud that accompanied every election for decades. As we have previously reported there exists no forensic study, research or investigation that does not show considerable cheating by the Democrats. Even today all Democrat states “are fighting the DOJ's Civil Rights Division in court trying to avoid having to turn over their corrupted voter rolls. If they hand over the voter rolls, and Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for Human Rights and the DOJ work in conjunction with the Census Bureau to compare the voter records with the citizenship records, they KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO SURFACE. The 2020 citizen vote mostly went to Trump. Dhillon ordered all states to provide their voter rolls over a year ago. The blue states refused. She is suing them as fast as the law permits, even five at a time, and winning (“Latest Finding, the Census Bureau also Helped Rig the 2020 Election,” LibertyUnderFire, August 26, 2026).
The Trump administration declassified documents demonstrating election vulnerabilities the most notable being: 1) “Evidence that China has obtained 220 million American voter registration files, some of which include non-public data, through buying, stealing or hacking. The administration’s intelligence chiefs later said that this represents “election interference.” 2) “Assessments from spy agencies beginning in 2020 that at least five foreign powers -- China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and Venezuela -- possess the ability to hack voting machines.” And, 3) “Evidence gathered by the Homeland Security Department that hundreds-of-thousands of likely illegal foreign voters were on the voter rolls [of] states–and estimated the total across the whole country to be higher” (“Homeland Security warns of Chinese parts in election machines, will require paper ballot audits,” Just The News, By Steven Richards August 27, 2026).
Consequently, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, referring to these recently declassified documents, including a 2024 ODNI Annual Threat Assessment, which concluded that China remains the “most active and persistent cyber threat to U.S. Government, private-sector, and critical infrastructure networks.” And their assessment “that some U.S. adversaries—at a minimum China, Iran, and Russia…have the technical capability to access some U.S. election-related networks and systems.” This remaining so, necessitated the issuance of the following directive for the 2026 midterm elections from Secretary Mullin.
“The declassification of these and other documents supports the need for strong mitigation strategies, particularly considering the known weaknesses in the election infrastructure supply chain. Voting machines with components manufactured by foreign adversaries introduce significant security risks. These vulnerabilities mean that malicious actors could potentially compromise election infrastructure at any stage of the supply chain even before the machines are assembled or deployed. If a component is tampered with during manufacturing, it could serve as a point-of-entry for hackers, allowing for the possibility of synchronized attacks across multiple machines and jurisdictions.”
Democrats know they will lose the 2026 midterms by a big margin. The GOP has worked for 5 1/2 years to block all cheating practices. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi essentially told Democrats to defy the results of the coming 2026 midterms with audits, freezes and suits.
“Unfortunately, the voting-system industry … is impacted by the fact that some necessary components cannot be sourced from domestic manufacturers, so vendors are dependent on foreign suppliers. Nine voting system vendors are used in U.S. elections. Three of those vendors, ES&S, Hart InterCivic, and Dominion, make up more than 80% of the market share. Representatives from each of those vendors have acknowledged that their voting machines have parts made in China…In some cases, there are simply no alternative suppliers….” (Secretary Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, August 24, 2026).
Election security is national security! The Homeland Security Grant Program requires states to verify the results produced by at least 5% of voting machines ballots, this to receive full grant awards. States must demonstrate that they have conducted random post-election manual counts of paper ballots to ensure that any errors or manipulation is detected. This is in addition to other actions like reconciling voter participation with ballots cast, and verifying voter and poll worker citizenship using the SAVE system. Non-compliance may result in withholding of 20% of the grant amount until proof of adherence is provided; this to secure election infrastructure. Since this impacts national security, defying states, for over a year, should lose the grant entirely and America should void the use of electronic voting machines until they are 100% secure.
This should end foreign influence in our elections, China, which is an act of war, or illegals and the treasonist collusion of the Democrat Party in that activity. Actually, Trump is making it improbable for Republicans to cheat as well. Why wouldn’t Democrats want that too?
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. Read his weekly columns at www.LibertyUnderFire.org. Column #888.
Share this column to help preserve liberty while we still can.
Thus far every study, audit, examination or review of the 2020 presidential election revealed substantial cheating by the Democrat Party that determined the outcome of that election—Trump won, Biden lost, but Trump wasn’t seated for a consecutive second term. LibertyUnderFire has covered dozens of these investigations over the years from the “2,000 Mules” docu-film, Arizona audit, Tiger Project, Social Security #’s allowing illegals to vote etc. to the latest finding. The Census Bureau also helped rig the 2020 presidential election. Show one study that did not ultimately show this result. Deep State news outlets do not dispute this, they simply censor these findings so their viewers remain ignorant. This column reveals two things the Census Bureau did to manage the outcome of the 2020 election.
Understand now why 35 states are fighting the DOJ's Civil Rights Division in court trying to avoid having to turn over their corrupted voter rolls? If they hand over the voter rolls, and Harmeet Dhillon and the DOJ work in conjunction with the Census Bureau to compare the voter records with the citizenship records, they KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO SURFACE. The Citizen vote went to Trump. Dhillon ordered all states to provide their voter rolls over a year ago. The blue states refuse. She is suing them as fast as the law permits, even five at a time.
First, Democrats had long gerrymandered districts based upon race giving them extra seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The recent 6 to 3 June Supreme Court decision, ruled that creating congressional districts primarily based on race was unconstitutional. That decision created an acceleration in redistricting in many blue states resulting in several new Republican districts. These are now heavily favored to secure the House for Republicans in 2026.
The second, the Census Bureau was caught undercounting citizens in red states and overcounting them in blue states in 2020. The principle reason for the Census is to determine taxes and the number of delegate seats in the House of Representatives as it was based upon population. At the time citizenship and population was synonymous (only citizens could vote). “Florida was undercounted by approximately 3.48 percent, or roughly 760,000 people, other red and purple states took similar hits, while several blue states were overcounted. Those distortions directly “translated into lost congressional seats and electoral college votes for Republican-leaning states.” Florida “was shortchanged representation it earned. Blue strongholds in the Northeast and elsewhere kept or gained seats they did not deserve… The bureau's own data showed nearly 11 million people were imputed… while real Americans [non illegals] in growing red states were missed… The Census Bureau failed in 2020 to complete this count (X22 Report, hereafter not cited, Ep. 3966b, August 9, 2026, 47:47).
On August 7, 2026, American First Legal (AFL), co-founded by Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller, filed a jurisdictional statement with the Supreme Court “demanding that the justices reverse a lower court's dismissal and force accountability for a count that systematically uncounted red states while padding blue ones…. A divided three-judge panel had thrown out the case in July, claiming the plaintiffs lacked standing and that the challenge came too late (Ibid.).”
Many remember at the end of Trump’s first term his trying to force the 2020 Census to require a citizenship question to the census form. “Trump claimed that it was needed to enforce The Voting Rights Act…. The Supreme Court rejected that argument” because the Constitution states that a census is conducted to count the number of persons in the U.S. – not the number of citizens. This, as mentioned, because at the time of the creation of the Constitution the population and citizenship were synonymous. There were no illegals. Trump correctly connected the Census to the Voting Rights Act because voting required citizenship.
The Supreme Court rejected Trump's requirement for a citizenship question on the 2020 Census thus Trump intentionally wrote a memorandum to exclude all illegals from the Census population count used for Congressional apportionment forcing the issue. Trump’s trap set, Democrats immediately filed a lawsuit. How better than in court, with the Memorandum, do you remove “illegals from congressional apportionment” and “clean up the fraud of congressional districts, especially in blue states?” The Supreme Court “dismissed the case on procedural grounds without ruling on the merits. It still sits undecided at the Supreme Court. Why is that a good thing? And part of the plan? The census counted the entire population in 2020. Trump can now compare government citizenship data with census data in every [single] state congressional district.” Cheating is proved to the exact number of illegals (non-citizens) voting.
CBS Morning News calls it “2020 Census Errors,” and Fox News agrees but views it far more than just errors, intentional. U.S. 2020 Census Records Survey finds six states, all red, undercounted votes with Florida undercounted by approximately 3.48 percent, or roughly 760,000 people. Map shows the percent in each state undercounted. The bureau's own data showed nearly 11 million people were imputed. Those distortions directly “translated into lost congressional seats and electoral college votes for Republican-leaning states. Eight states, all blue, overcounted their votes.
It was not “a coincidence that DOGE recently finish cleansing the data of Social Security and removed all the non-citizens, dead people, and fraudulent accounts” making it a lot easier to compare citizenship data with the 2020 census and the 2020 election. That is what Trump did. The census counted the entire population in 2020. Trump can now compare government citizenship data with census data in every [single] state congressional district.” Cheating is proved to the exact number of illegals (non-citizens) voting. “Congressional districts are based off census data. Candidates are elected based upon the votes of citizens. Only citizens can vote in federal elections. Dems have been using illegals to corrupt our entire elections for decades” (Ep. 3975b, Aug. 20, 2026, 56:56).
Meanwhile, according to President Trump, “The Census Bureau has begun checking the Voting Records from 2020 against their Citizenship Records. On the first 128,000,000 voters the Census Bureau proves that over 24,000 non-citizens voted illegally! The Census Bureau is going to analyze the next 32,000,000 voters and this number will explode. I won the election” (Ep. 3974b, Aug. 19, 2026, 53:58)!
Brian Cates asks, “Why was this not caught by the states? Because the state systems have been DELIBERATELY SET UP NOT TO CATCH IT. It took the Census Bureau checking voter records against the governments citizenship records to determine this. Understand now why 35 states are fighting the DOJ's Civil Rights Division in court trying to avoid having to turn over their voter rolls? If they hand over the voter rolls, and Harmeet Dhillon and the DOJ work in conjunction with the Census Bureau to compare the voter records with the citizenship records, they KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO SURFACE. The 35 states are determined to avoid that at all costs.” Blue states are covering up their crime (Ibid., 54:07). Latest finding, the Census Bureau also helped rig the 2020 election for Democrats.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org. Column #887.
Share this column to help preserve liberty while we still can.
On August 6, 2026 Trump issued two new executive orders sure to send birthright citizenship back to the Supreme Court. This from his intentionally ending the practice by Executive Order 14160, titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” White House, January 20, 2025. The executive order challenged the prevailing over 50-year-plus distortion of the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, The words birthright, baby, or immigration weren’t in the amendment, then, nor now. Trump ended birthright citizenship in the United States for children of unauthorized immigrants as well as immigrants legally but temporarily present in the U.S., such as those on student, work, or tourist visas. On June 30, 2026, his order was shockingly declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark of March 28, 1898 was the first Supreme Court case to decide on the status of children born in the United States to alien parents. This decision “repurposed” THE 14TH AMENDMENT, WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IMMIGRATION, from U.S. Ex-slaves and their offspring seeking citizenship to illegals aliens invading our borders. It is TOTALLY unconstitutional to change the meaning of an amendment to something never intended by its authors. Even one perversion leeds to others.
With this distortion the 14th Amendment was “repurposed,” as Justice Clarence Thomas called it, from giving ex-slaves citizenship after the Civil War to birth citizenship for illegals invading America who, while present, deliver a baby who gains citizenship enabling that child to sponsor them for citizenship later. The 13th amendment made ex—slaves free, the 14th extended ex-slaves citizenship and the 15th, the right to vote. These Reconstruction Era amendments cannot be seen separately and have nothing to do with immigration. Those receiving it then were ex-slaves. They dealt almost entirely with our black population. In the Court’s recent decision we could not get further from original intent or as constitutionally written. It’s a massive perversion.
On August 6, 2026, Trump issued Executive Order “Continuing to Protect the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” to essentially move back to original intent and at least limit the privilege, as once it was before 1898. United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), itself a distortion, affirmed that children born in the U.S. are citizens unless they fall under certain exceptions. These exceptions were identified in Trump’s recent EO’s as: “children of alien enemies, members of designated foreign terrorist organization, or specifically designated global terrorists, children of certain foreign government employees, diplomats, embassy, consular staff with immunity, children whose parents engage in commercial transaction to obtain citizenship, explicitly including birth tourism packages or paid surrogacy arrangements aimed at securing a U.S. birth, children born in certain U.S. territories where federal statute does not already confer citizenship, agencies are directed not to issue or recognize citizenship documents for people in these categories when neither parent is a U.S. citizen (White House, Executive Orders, August 6. 2026). The Deep State and far left Democrats want no exceptions—anyone birthed in the U.S.—even for one day.
We are optimistic that the Supreme Court will switch this vote as they have previously supported many of these “exceptions” in the past. Anticipate many lawsuits here but it will end up in the Supreme Court who will have a second chance to regain the confidence of the American public after their last ruling on birth citizenship, especially Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
Trump's second August 6, 2026, Executive Order titled, “Ending Birth Tourism,” is “entirely different. It uses the president's existing statutory authority over visas and admission to the United States.” It directs the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security to “deny visas, revoke travel authorization, bar entry, and remove people who come or arrange for others to come for the primary purpose of giving birth to obtain citizenship for their child (Ibid.).
In either executive order the Trump administration “is not claiming the power to overrule the Supreme Court. It is arguing that these narrow categories fit inside the historical exception the court itself recognized.” (X22 Report, Ep. 3966b, August 9, 2026, 44:43). But he IS CLAIMING CLARITY on their statement in Trump V. Barbara, that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution extends the privilege of citizenship to children born to parents in the United States “for whom no extraterritorial fiction applie[s].” What does that mean? This means someone is fully considered to be in the place where they physically are, rather than being treated as if they are still on foreign soil,” which they should be until they meet the qualifications of citizenship.
This opens a can of worms. So you are a citizen of any country you visit, at least for a time, because that is where you presently are? If so, the Supreme Court opened the doors to every person in the world who could get to America, and you are recognized as a citizen because you are here. Insane!! The visa entry restrictions on birth tourism are the part least likely to be seen as a direct challenge to the Court's constitutional holding.
"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, and aliens." We have desecrated Senator Howard's citizenship clause even giving preference to these excluded groups.
Trump is going to operate within the interpretation of the Supreme Court’s ruling. The ruling left intact the traditional narrow historical exceptions, mainly children of foreign diplomats with immunity and children of invading enemy forces, where “extraterritorial fiction” applies, so they're not considered fully under U.S. jurisdiction” (Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump V. Barbara, 609 U.S. _, 146 S. Ct. 2438, 2449 (2026). Trump will likely get his win.
In Trump v. Barbara, Chief Justice John Roberts held that “children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause” (Ibid.). He did not explain how it is possible to be ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States if you are not first a citizen and are admittedly unlawfully in the United States. Ex-slaves were life-long residents and lawfully in the United States so undisputedly “subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States thus once freed could get citizenship. Illegals came from somewhere in which they were subject to a jurisdiction and THAT WAS NOT IN THE United States. Worse, their kid can’t have the jurisdiction not possessed by either parent.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org. Column #885.
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
On November 4, 2020, in the United States of America, the Deep State unseated the president of the United States in a supposedly free election and finished their coup d’état against Donald Trump January 6, 20021, when by design it caused an insurrection in the Capitol. This resulted in a emergency which caused many members of Congress to flee the Capitol allowing them to bypass the objection process required by the Electoral College and move unconstitutionally to seat a person selected by China together with Deep State players in the United States. The election was fraught with corruption. The new “elected” government knew it. The coup d’état was complete. An unelected government assumed leadership over the country. This happened by not following the Constitution, with media complacency, and sadly, half the nation cheering.
Trump announced that the People’s Republic of China interfered with the 2020 presidential election essentially seating our U.S. President.
During the 20th Century our leading military opponent was some form of socialism. Millions died in World War II defeating Germany’s fascist socialism and later during the proxy wars against communism in Korea and Vietnam and the Cold War thereafter. Today Communist China remains a leading threat to peace in the world especially since unleashing the Wuhan China Virus on the world and China’s building a military base in the South Pacific in shallow international waters it made into islands for that purpose.
The 1950s and sixties were fraught with fear that the world would be taken over by socialism as country after country fell to communism. Between the 1920’s and 1980’s Congress considered the internal threat so serious that both houses had intelligence committees publishing intelligence reports on the threat of socialism in the United States itself. A coup d'état was viewed as possible. Democrats always opposed these committees and under President Bill Clinton they were gradually abolished. In my possession are several hundred studies, all confirming that such groups were active in the United States and promoted its overthrow.
Sometime during the 1950’s the military and congress had to decide, given their oath to preserve the Constitution and the Republic created by it, what should be their response should a coup d'état with a socialist foreign power seat a president of the United States? Does their oath obligate them to remove the foreign influence under treason and restore the Republic? Together they concluded it did. We live in the age of information warfare (IW) and cyber attacks have become a favorite and powerful tool in submitting opponents. Pearl Harbors can occur in different ways as in the hacking by China of our 2020 presidential election. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Sections 11.3 and 11.4 acknowledges the threat of information wars.
As LibertyUnderFire recently reported “New Proof Positive that China Voted in America’s Election 2020.” China elected Joe Biden occupant of the White House by electronically shifting Trump votes to Biden. Many people suspected and the new Biden government knew with certainty. As we have reported military intelligence under the Space Force knew the election was going to include foreign intervention and recorded every China hack, the number of votes switched from Trump to Biden, the IP number of every sending and receiving computer, the time of day to the second and the length of every hack—proof positive China seated a U.S. President.
The documentation of a coup d'état with a foreign power is far too overwhelming and serious to ignore because it is equal to a Pearl Harbor Attack on its effect on the country. Treason is defined as, “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere.” It is punishable by death or imprisonment (18 USC Ch. 115: Treason, Sedition, and Subversive activities).
This must be investigated and THOROUGHLY DISPROVED before another election is ever held, not caustically discarded or dismissed because no court will examine the evidence and the media censors and cancels those with the evidence as did ChatGPT. Why? Because no election going forward will ever be fully trusted by either side. If perpetrators are not identified and punished why would the socialists not do the same thing in every election going forward? And why would China thereafter seated in our government, not increase its power over us and we become, in essence, a China colony? The coup d'état conquered America without firing a shot.
Socialist dominate the Democrat Party and virtually every information medium in America and now, in lock-step, block every vehicle for that documentation to get to the American people. Thus the military is the only option for redress, but do they have authority to reverse a coup? When treason with China is fully established the military is under obligation to intervene even if the executive branch, their boss, is an accomplice. If their oath means anything and they have proof positive China was responsible for the current occupant in the White House, absolutely.
Space Force documentation included a chart with numerous columns: DATE of theft, SOURCE IP, SOURCE OWNER, SOURCE ID, TARGET IP, TARGET STATE, TARGET OWNER, TARGET ID, INTRUSION METHOD, SUCCESS, TRACE LOG, and CHANGED VOTES of every Chinese attack in every county in America. Many believe Lou Dobbs was fired from Fox News just before he intended to reveal the above and Mike Lindell was discredited and bankrupted because he did.
LibertyUnderFire.org published, “New Proof Positive that China Voted in America’s Election” February 19, 2021, and wrote this article at about the same time, but felt to withhold publishing it as Trump still remained the most likely opposition candidate to return to power in 2024. As you recall, his opposition threatened to invade the White House and drag him out if he did not vacate. He did so to avoid a civil war but never conceded to Biden, intentionally choosing to comeback nonviolently. He knew military intelligence had all the information on the rigged election. As long as there was a path (he was never fully out of a comeback), evidence of treason was still coming out through Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, now X, Trumps’ Truth Social, and Rumble, and hope for eventual justice still existed. Patriots joined him in peacefully waiting. His 2024 landslide election clearly showed America was with him. Suppressed documentation will follow. Thus far we have not needed the military to return the Republic but may need military tribunals.
Again, military intelligence through Space Force had the accurate vote of the 2020 election. In a two hour docu-movie called ABSOLUTE PROOF Mike Lindell tried to show that Trump had nearly 80 million votes to Biden’s 68 million. ALL Deep State media sources, like a choir, blocked coverage of his findings predictably calling it a conspiracy theory.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. Read more of his weekly columns visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Help preserve our Republic while we stall can by sharing this column.
The most powerful portion of President Trump’s Address to the Nation 7/16/26 reads, “Newly declassified documents show that over a period of years starting during the 2020 election cycle, the People's Republic of China carried out what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history – resulting in China's illicit acquisition of 220 million U.S. voter files. That information includes names, addresses, phone numbers, political party preferences, and other sensitive data that would be needed to register to vote and engage in other nefarious activities which is exactly what is happening.” (Trump Address to the Nation 7/16/26, Whitehouse, 23:10).
In the last six years ALL forensic studies, actual evidence, and over 1,000 whistle blowers at penalty of perjury, INDEPENDENTLY gave the 2020 win to Trump. The other side controls most of the news and social media and relies on censorship and silence to block Americans from knowing the truth. But to know these things people have to get off the Deep State’s programing channels. Did you escape the programming?
Was the 2020 presidential election stolen? Over the six years since the contested election LibertyUnderFire.org (LUF) has published numerous columns as new documents or findings became known. Not one study exists documenting that the 2020 presidential election was not stolen—yet there exists a plethora of documentation that it was. The most conclusive being Dinesh D'Souza's movie “2,000 Mules” which provided the public 1 hour and 28 minutes of solid evidence of a stolen election (“2,000 Mules: They Thought We’d Never Find Out. They Were Wrong,” LUF, June 10, 2022). In effect we were allowed to watch it being stolen in real time by Americans. Let’s review some of what we published over that time period.
Utilizing the research of TrueTheVote founders, Cathrine Engel Brecht and Gregg Phillips, offered two types of evidence: geotracking and video, each placing the crime and criminal in the same place. “The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in drop boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence.” This should satisfy a conviction in any real court in the land. According to Phillips,“TrueTheVote analyzed more than a petabyte (1,000 terabytes) of data from smartphones in Phoenix, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Las Vegas, covering the time period from October 1 through Election Day (and through January 6 in Georgia to cover the Senate runoff” (“We Caught Them All, From their Own Cellphones,” June 6, 2022, AND, “Election Fraud Ten Times Bigger than ‘2,000 Mules.’ The Tiger Project,” Sept. 15, 2022, both by Harold Pease, Ph.D. LibertyUnderFire.org). Yes America, Democrats stole the election of 2020 and seated an illegitimate president.
Was China involved in the stolen 2020 presidential election? Yes again!! When TrueTheVote proved in “2000 Mules” that the domestic vote fraud was more than enough to have “elected” Joe Biden, it became the most serious crime in American history—even a coup to overthrow the president of the United States. But their research ALSO documented collusion between many high profile Americans with a foreign country, China. For Americans “knowingly” involved, this was treason and for the foreign country, an act of war against the United States. If they “knowingly” covered up the China connection they were working for that foreign government. The China Communist Party (CCP) was found to be in the very center of the plot. This is a new type of conquest from within and by infiltration rather than by invasion; most certainly ten times bigger than “2000 Mules.” The Biden FBI and DOJ refused to help TrueTheVote. If the Biden government were colluding and abetting with the enemy, they would not be helpful in investigating themselves. None of what Dr. Pease published was in Deep State presses.
TrueTheVote had to form their own investigative body. They needed other investigative journalists to prob further with them. They called their group of “over 100 experienced thinkers and researchers,” The Tiger Project. Their first three findings were startling 1) “Almost all the software code in the ABS platform is being used to run elections in hundreds of U.S. counties … written by programmers from the CCP” (China Communist Party). 2) These were “owned by CEOs running companies with direct ties to the CCP.” 3) “CCP law means whatever code they write, whatever app they own, any platform they have a right to take digital information on the Apple platform and download it to China because they own it. It's theirs” (Ibid.,“Election Fraud).
The China Communist Party (CCP) wrote the code for, manages, and operates the EMS system in multiple countries and in the United States for hundreds of counties. The CCP also maintains 220 million U.S. voter files and 1.8 million, that have worked in the elections in the United States for the last several years, plus their families. These files, it is supposed, can only be used for nefarious election purposes. Why? Socialists in our country allowed it.
So what information, besides voter results, does TrueTheVote believe was shipped to China by Konnech, creator of PolChief software used by thousands of election offices across U.S.? Apparently every person that has worked on a local election in the United States in recent years is already known to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). “1.8 million Americans who volunteered to participate in local elections in their counties. All have their personal information on a server in Wuhan, China, data which, under Chinese law, belongs to the CCP.” Not just “their names, pictures, addresses, names of their kids, etc. but down to the schematics and detailed maps of the building they worked in and more. Down to how the elections work and who works in the elections.” China has weaponized our elections. “The CCP has an incredible amount of information stored about these election workers and their families that it has been using for more than a few years now in order to learn everything there is to know about how local elections are being run inside the United States.” (“China Interfered in the 2020 Presidential Election, After All,” By Harold Pease, Ph.D., LUF, Sept. 2, 2022).
Trump offers us again what was censored away in 2020, six years ago, for those smart enough to know our media has been controlled by the Deep State for decades. Most now can see. The left, then and now, offers no comment other than its a big lie which never worked for those willing to question and probe. The documents are all real and conclusive and say—2020 was rigged and the Coup to remove Trump then worked. There are no studies that document otherwise. But this side of the issue is challenged by an enemy that argues with silence and censorship. Silence is not a counter argument, ignoring the evidence as though it never happened does not change that it did happen. It only makes one MORE ignorant. This time Trump has forced them to deal with the evidence because most people now believe the 2020 presidential election was rigged.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. Read his weekly columns @ www.LibertyUnderFire.org Column #882.
Help preserve our Republic while we still can by sharing this column.
