It always amazes me when otherwise intelligent people are unable to find evidence of God in our governing documents. The Declaration of Independence alone, the signing of which we commemorate July 4th, has five references to God—two in the first paragraph, one in the second, and two in the last. Let us read together its favored parts:
The first and second come together, “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God (emphasis added) entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.” Who is responsible for “the laws of nature” but God—certainly not man nor nature itself. From the “laws of nature” sprang an awareness of natural law (sometimes called common sense), understood by early philosophers to be a source of higher law that never changes.
This was best explained by Cicero, a Roman politician as early as the 1st Century B. C. —even predating the existence of Christianity, when he wrote: “Nor may any other law override it, nor may it be repealed as a whole or in part… Nor is it one thing at Rome and another at Athens, one thing today and another tomorrow, but one eternal and unalterable law, that binds all nations forever.”
Of “Nature’s God,” the creator of the laws of nature, the second reference to deity is, of course, more explicit and needs no addition explanation. Simply, nature too, the wind, rain, sun, planet rotation, the universe itself, even the sprouting of seeds in their time obey God. Organized and governed through natural law—not chaos—is evidence that he exists and remains involved. God indeed is nature’s God as well as our own.
The third reference to God is the word “creator” found in the second paragraph. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Inalienable rights are endowed by God thus cannot be repealed by human law. The three identified may encompass others as well but the Founders saw God as more than just a creator — He wanted his creation free and happy as well. They boldly identified our base for unalienable rights as God, and identified this truth as self-evident. Any person endowed with common sense or reason would/could come to this conclusion.
So passionate were they with respect to these three “God-given rights” that such were identified as the purposes of government. “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
”Moreover, their right of revolution hinged upon a government’s denial of these “God-given rights.” They wrote: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes… But when a long train of abuses and usurpations… evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.” Once again, an appeal to natural law, which emanates from God, was noted and the loss of which always justifies revolution—any time period, people, place, or language! America would be the first to hinge their revolution on natural (God’s) law, as stipulated in the Declaration.
To ensure that the people retained the same right and means of revolution as they were using to claim and obtain their freedom, under the laws of nature as instituted by God, they later institutionalized “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” in the subsequent Bill of Rights of the Constitution. This right they boldly declared in the strongest language possible “shall not be infringed.” They viewed it as “being necessary to the security of a free State.” So its placement as the second most valued freedom in the Bill of Rights had nothing to do with personal safety or hunting, these were already assumed and practiced for centuries. It was specifically placed right after freedom of religion, speech, press and assembly to make certain that these freedoms were never taken from future generations—you and I. It was aimed (pun intended) squarely at government.
The fourth and fifth references to God are found in the last paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. The rightness of their cause was left to God as judge. “We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown….” Not only did God exist but the Founders knew as well that they would be judged by Him for their intentions.
The fifth and last reference to God asks for, and expects given, His divine protection in their revolutionary course of action. “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” No European political prognosticator in that day gave the colonies a ghost of a change against the most powerful nation in the world. God did!!
There was no dissent noted with respect to these references to God and their placement or emphasis in this document by any of the participants then, nor should there be now.
(The above is Dr. Pease’s 668 published column on current events and the Constitution).
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Those in power, at the moment, aim to destroy the 2nd Amendment by any means possible and with it liberty. They know what they are doing. A favorite tool for them are “red flag” laws. These trespass the 2nd amendment as well as the IV, V, VI and XIV. Let us examine the damage done to each.
Amendment II reads in part, “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Government is specifically denied making ANY laws concerning the people’s right to bear arms. No exceptions are permitted outside a new amendment through Article V allowing only the states, 3/4th agreement required, to process a change—not the federal government. Anything short of this is a serious “infringement” (violation) of the Constitution. All executive orders of any president or laws of any congress infringing this right are null and void upon origination. This is so, whether it be Congress’s “red flag” laws or Biden’s magazine limitations; or similar measures originating from any state, county or city. This was insured by the Founding Fathers. No other amendment was more strongly worded against governmental manipulation. The federal government’s present attempt to disarm the civilian population cannot/will not stand.
Amendment IV, reads in part, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” Today computers and electronic devices are our “papers” and “effects” our instruments of self preservation and identity. In the case of arms it is “unreasonable” to confiscate them on someones assumption that they may be used inappropriately. We might also wish to remove the people’s automobiles, knives, hammers, or medicines they MIGHT use to harm themselves or others. Heretofore “probable cause” for government home invasions, searches and seizures was based upon evidence, not opinion or accusation. Again, there exists no crime in having things until wrongfully using them against others. Otherwise personal freedom is non-existing.
Amendment V reads in part: “No person shall be…deprived of…property, without due process of law.” Due process is denied thousands under “red flag” laws. None accused were arrested, charged with a crime, or convicted before their gun(s) is/was confiscation.
Amendment VI requires that all accused must be “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; … be confronted with the witnesses against him; … have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and … have the assistance of counsel for his defence.” In the case of “red flag” laws none of these four required conditions, prior to confiscation, were met as no crime had been committed. The targeted had no opportunity to resist gun confiscation.
Finally, Amendment XIV. “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” This amendment extends all “privileges or immunities” to the states as well. Thus they too, cannot infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. “Red flag” laws totally deny “due process.”
“Red flag” laws, aim squarely at removing the 2nd Amendment from a segment of the civilian population, and violate four other Amendments as well—almost half the Bill of Rights.
“Red flag,” laws are thought to be the “go to legislation” for the presumed mentally unstable of society that could resort to violence against themselves or others. These potentially allow thousands of innocent citizens to be punished only upon the fear that a crime might be committed. Secret lists of innocent people are created by family, acquaintances, and potentially disgruntled ex-lovers or spouses—perhaps even the government. Anyone that can approach a judge with the claim that someone is a danger to himself and/or others, the sheriff is sent to disarm and confiscate that person’s weapon(s). Those identified are punished without having committed a crime. All this, too often, without a shred of evidence of criminal behavior.
In some states anyone can make a phone call to the police—even from out the state. “There is no hearing. All the judge has before him is the statement of concern.” Moreover, “little certainty is needed. Some states allow initial confiscations on just a ‘reasonable suspicion,’ which is little more than a guess or a hunch.”
The biggest problem with red flag evaluations is that they happen “ex parte,” without the defendant present to defend himself. Due process, guaranteed in the Bill of Rights in three places, is denied. If “ex parte,” a second hearing is scheduled, some weeks later, where the defendant must provide evidence of his innocence. You must prove yourself innocent of something that you never did, nor possibly thought of doing, but was previously punished by the forcible confiscation of your weapons(s). What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?“We are dangerously close to destroying the backbone of our judicial system, the presumption of innocence.” If in this situation consider contacting the U.S. & Texas LawShield Blog
Red flag laws are unconstitutional and were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Caniglia v. Strom et al. as recently as May 17, 2021 by unanimous decision. These violate due process and strip away 2nd Amendment rights from citizens who have committed no crimes. Caniglia’s guns were seized by police acting on a call from his spouse, a clear violation of the due process as articulated in the 4th Amendment (X22 Reports Ep. 2800B-June 15, 2022, 8:10).
Democrats are presently in charge of the legislative and executive branches of the nation and govern perhaps half of state governments. They also greatly dominate main stream media and Internet news censoring everything contrary to their narrative thus coverage on this decision was/is noticeably absent. So far they appear to be disregarding this Supreme Court ruling in their bold, aggressive attempt to disarm America civilians and damage the Constitution.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Geometric tracking has been used in fighting crime for a few years. Donald Trump used it “to detect illegal aliens entering the U.S. unlawfully, (such as through under ground tunnels), “to look for cellphone activity in unusual places such as remote stretches of desert that straddle the Mexican border, and to track human and drug smugglers” (Federal Agencies Use Cellphone Location Data for Immigration Enforcement, By Byron Tau and Michelle Hackman ,The Wall Street Journal, February 10, 2020). Barack Obama may have had something like this in mind when he issued free cell phones to illegals crossing into the United States.
That someone would think to use it on those illegally stuffing ballot drop boxes is brilliant. Geometric tracking made known every person who came near a ballot drop box in the 2020 presidential election, where he came from and where he went thereafter, especially when he is stuffing more than just one ballot drop box in the county. All this from his own cellphone and with his implied permission.
Such technology just ended the debate. There was massive election fraud in the 2020 presidential election, far more than sufficient to have overturned the election. When one’s own phone places him at the scene of the crime—stuffing more than one ballot box—and the video camera placed by the state above each box stuffed photographing the crime as it took place, there is no denying the crime. Over 2,000 ballot traffickers “visited over 10 different ballot drop boxes and at least 5 different nonprofit organizations identified as ‘stash houses,’” each, where the ballots were obtained, during the election time frame between October 1 and Election Day, Nov. 3, (https://www.planet-today.com/2022/05/fact-checking-fact-checkers-debunking.html).
These were called mules in Dinesh D’Souza’s 2,000 Mules movie documentary. Over 2,000 paid criminal traffickers delivered illegal ballots, thousands more than needed to have reversed the election results. All 2,000 vote manipulating criminals could be prosecuted and will be shocked when they see video of themselves stuffing multiple ballot boxes accompanied by the “ping trail” of every place they had visited while the camera above filmed their crime. Pieces in the Washington Post and the New York Times published years before characterized cellphone location data as quite specific and reliable. (See, One Nation Tracked, New York Times, An investigation into the smartphone tracking industry from Times Opinion, Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy, By Stuart A. Thompson and Charlie Warzel, Dec. 19, 2019).
The Times reported how easy it was to get private information with multiple pings. A ping is the precise location of a single smartphone. Especially after 2019, when “this new data included a remarkable piece of information: a unique ID for each user that is tied to a smartphone. This made it even easier to find people, since the supposedly anonymous ID could be matched with other databases containing the same ID, allowing us to add real names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses and other information about smartphone owners in seconds.”
Democrats used geometric tracking to identify, than arrest, those coming to the Capitol to peacefully protest what they believed had been a fraudulent election. Turns out they were absolutely right!! 2,000 Mules has shown, beyond reasonable doubt, how they overthrew an elected president. The green lights in the photo above are pings showing the precise location of a cellphone on a person in the crowd. These cellphone pings allowed the FBI to discover who they were track them back to their homes and arrest them.
“The IDs, called mobile advertising identifiers, allow companies to track people across the internet and on apps. They are supposed to be anonymous, and smartphone owners can reset them or disable them entirely. Our findings show the promise of anonymity is a farce. Several companies offer tools to allow anyone with data to match the IDs with other databases.”
As a matter of poetic justice the criminals were all caught by their own cellphone evidence in pocket or purse from the fine print in app. privacy policies giving companies the right to sell their “information to other companies that can make it available to advertisers, or whoever wants to pay to obtain it” (Planet-Today.com). The government normally obtains it through purchase just as the advertisers do and just as True The Vote did that provided the data for 2,000 Mules. The data purchased by True The Vote “most likely contained the mobile advertising identifier information, which would allow True The Vote to discern the real names, addresses, etc. attached to each potential “mule” device’s owner in seconds.”
Democrats can’t be too unhappy with their being geometrically tracked in their attempted coup to overthrow the elected president of the United States. They themselves used it to track those at the Capitol January 6, 2021 protesting that same overthrow (“They Stormed the Capitol. Their Apps Tracked Them.” The New York Times, Feb. 5, 2021). The NY Times has always been a Democratic Party asset, decidedly anti-Trump, and globalist.
2000 Mules, a documentary film created by Dinesh D’Souza, from the evidence assembled by Gregg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht of True The Vote exposes widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome. Yes America, Democrats stole the election of 2020 and seated an illegitimate president. We know 2,000 Mules was conservative in its labeling a mule, so mule effect in this election, may be many times more than just 2,000. “In Philadelphia alone, True The Vote identified 1,155 “mules” who illegally collected and dropped off ballots for money” (Planet-Today.com).
But what follows could be even more damning for Democrats. Gregg Philips says even more information is coming out amplifying their findings. He told the the Arizona Assembly recently, “We do indeed have a matter brewing that is 10 times bigger than the Mules. It will be about six weeks before we can clear our way through it. But I assure you it is the most explosive issue that you have ever come in contact with relating to elections in the United States.” He gave a couple of clues regarding the data they have yet to reveal. Who is controlling the mules, follow the money, and “They can even see who you’re talking to.” We will have to wait to know more (X22 Reports Ep. 2789B, June 1, 2022, 42:00).
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Dinesh D’Souza’s movie “2,000 Mules” is introduced with Joe Biden saying, “We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American Politics.” Then follows 1 hour and 28 minutes of solid evidence proving his admission in the 2020 presidential election that should satisfy a conviction in any real court in the land. If the person accused boastfully admits guilt—through the fraud organization he created—why not accept his word at face value? His organization stole the election for him.
With this confession why has Biden not been impeached by his own political party? Because he, his party, and RINO Republicans are part of the “fraud organization” he admits having created. To establish his quilt we do not need the 2021 Arizona Forensic Audit or other audits since, all further verifying the Biden claim, nor even “2,000 Mules.” The need is to catch his accomplices.
I waited more than a month to consider opposing arguments before commenting on this bombshell, jaw-dropping movie showing the crimes committed in real time by state installed cameras and geotracking the cellphones of those committing the crimes. Was their enough evidence to have turned the election in the five contested states? With certainty!!!
Only The Associated Press dared make a feeble attempt to do so which was easily debunked by Planet Today (“Fact Checking the Fact Checkers: Debunking AP’s ‘2000 Mules’ Hit Piece,” May 16, 2022). Otherwise, Big Tech and all the networks who treat everything detrimental to Biden as disinformation participated in its coverup. Even Fox News and NewsMax did nothing to promote “2,000 Mules.” Sandra Smith of Fox News made a snide remark that the election fraud issue had been debunked months ago refusing to even look at the new, compelling and very different, data presented by “2000 Mules.” Consequently most informed people have moved to Rumble and other Internet platforms for reliable information on this and many other issues.
Despite the massive news blackout of “2,000 Mules,” excepting word of mouth and uncensored outlets, as of June 3, 2022 had been well attended. Rasmussen Reports survey reported, that “over 20 million” had seen it and that “77% said that the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election.” The poll survey of a 1,000 who watched also showed that the movie was being viewed by Democrats and non-affiliated groups as well (“Convincing: 77% believe 2000 Mules, and 20M have seen it,” by Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner, June 3, 2022).
On Amazon it’s the number one release in the “Movies and TV” category thus far this year. As a documentary, it is the “year’s biggest documentary hit of 2022 … to date.” In its first two weeks of release it earned $1.3 million (“‘2000 Mules’ Is Year’s Top-Grossing Documentary (So Far),” by Christian Toto, HitHollywood, June 3, 2022).
As mentioned “2000 Mules,” utilizing the research of True The Vote founders Cathrine Engel Brecht and Gregg Phillips, offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video each placing the crime and criminal in the same place. “The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in drop boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence.”
According to Phillips,“True The Vote analyzed more than a petabyte (1,000 terabytes) of data from smartphones in Phoenix, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Las Vegas, covering the time period from October 1 through Election Day (and through January 6 in Georgia to cover the Senate runoff). In Atlanta, the group says that by using that data they identified 242 ‘mules’ who met their criteria (visited 10 different ballot drop boxes and at least five different nonprofit organizations identified as ‘stash houses’ during that time frame” (https://www.planet-today.com/2022/05/fact-checking-fact-checkers-debunking.html).
Yes America, Democrats stole the election of 2020 and seated an illegitimate president. Arrests from the evidence presented in “2,000 Mules” is already in progress. A grand jury in Russel County Virginia has indicted Knox District Supervisor Trey Adkins on 82 counts. Yuma County Arizona announced that “as of March 2022 their office had 16 open voting and registration investigations, and outlined four types of election fraud they have identified in Yuma County: impersonation fraud, false registrations, duplicate voting, and fraudulent use of absentee ballots.”
This is only the beginning. True The Vote will be releasing ALL of its data to the public soon in what’s named Operation Ripcord . County sheriffs and Attorney generals need only assess gathered evidence for criminality then follow up with arrests, indictments and trials which could be thousands. Ironically their own cellphones and the state placed video cameras already recorded every aspect of their crime. Those indicted will reveal who paid them, all the way to presumably George Soros and others. This must happen to prevent election fraud going forward.
Game over. Now no reasonable viewer can deny his own eyes. The documentation is as good as it gets and would stand up in any real court when presented; probably as good as needed for convictions of 90% of those presently incarcerated. “2,000 Mules” is the electoral smoking gun.
“2,000 Mules” is a must watch video for every American who values liberty. A free government requires a free press and an informed participating public. A media that censors information or puts together, “the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American Politics,” as Biden admits doing, is not free.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
In no school massacre was an officer of the law on the scene in time to stop the first killing. But one person always is—a teacher or staff member. If but one faculty or staff in the room, or close by, had a concealed weapon to defend their students and themselves and did so, school massacres would mostly vanish for the same reason the Uvalde, Texas Police Department stood down. Reportedly, they were afraid. This is the most reasonable solution to potential school massacres.
How do I know with certainty that this is the most reasonable solution. Because the teacher is likely to be in the room when a shooter arrives and also his first victim. Thus he /she has two motives that ensures his/her action: self-preservation and the preservation of the students he knows and is responsible for. No policemen has a greater motivation to action than this teacher.
54% of Voters Support Arming School Staff
Years ago a gunman entered a classroom in a high school immediately adjacent to the college where I was teaching and opened with a 12 gauge shot gun on two classmates that for years had bullied him. The first was wounded severely but survived, the second he missed. Both schools, the high school and the college next door, went into immediate lockdown.
In my college classroom, as in most, there was but one door, which opened outwardly and could be locked only from the outside. Everyone inside, including me the professor, has been set up by his own government and school board to be a victim. If this were the assailants first classroom no one could possibly get to the door in time to lock it from the outside.
For years my only defense was to ask students sitting on the door side of the room, upon hearing gunfire from outside the room, to lineup next to the wall, remove the fire extinguisher from the wall next to the door that opens outwardly, and spray or hit the intruder as he enters. Those behind him then were to overwhelm the intruder after the distraction, but this is all that we could do and it likely would not be enough. Since my students were adults this could work with a lot of luck. Again, if we were a killer’s first classroom such is actually a “free kill zone.”
In a college that refused to be a gun free zone a teacher or other adult with a concealed weapons permit, need only pull out a weapon from pocket or purse and fire a couple of rounds at a very surprised—then very dead—potential killer saving several minutes (in the case of Robb Elementary School in Uvalde Texas, over an hour) of indiscriminate slaughter. Instead, 19 children and 2 adults were killed while up to 19 law enforcement agents declined to enter.
But in a grade school fewer adults are in the room to save all. Still, if but one armed concealed weapons permit holder, had been in the classrooms or close by, a custodian, a secretary, a parent assisting the teacher, he/she could have saved up to 21 lives. This is the reason shooters prefer grade schools—no real resistance.
Why not have employee permit holders do so on school grounds as well, allowing them to be an asset of protection wherever they are? They are on the scene, care for their students, are a trusted profession in society, and, most importantly, are themselves threatened. It would cost the school little or nothing. Chances are every school has several concealed weapons permit holders among its faculty and staff already. Again, why not let those who wish to protect their students do so?
This is not to suggest that every teacher must participate—only those who wish to. Hundreds of regular permit holding citizens in my previous county in California, already carried concealed weapons permits, as did I, everywhere except in gun free zones (others call “free kill zones”). Such is the same in most counties throughout the nation. Law enforcement normally see permit holders as an asset, the ultimate backup should they need extra help, and also because cops know they can’t be everywhere at the same time, as some Uvalde, Texas residents learned the hard way. Why not let them be an asset of protection wherever they are; on school grounds as well? Some, like myself, would gladly participate in protecting those whom they serve.
Permit holders are among our finest citizens. Obtaining a concealed weapons permit requires a thorough investigation, a near perfect record from law enforcement, sometimes a stated need to carry, and some training. Normally they are older more mature folks and, in the case of teachers, society already trusts their young people to them several hours a day. They are already on the scene where a policeman could not possibly be. What a deterrent to a would-be killer if he knew schools are not so vulnerable.
Why not tell him so with a sign at every approach to the campus and every office door, in large print? “ATTENTION Please Be Aware that the Staff at (your school name) May Be Armed And Will Use Whatever Force is Necessary to Protect Our Students” ( X22 Reports, EP. 2784B, May 26, 2022, 23:00). School shootings would mostly vanish.
Gun free zones clearly do not work as most massacres in the United States happen in them and law breakers do not care about the law. Anticipating no resistance, rather than deter, they entice killers giving them access to large groups of unprotected and innocent victims—usually children.
Most gunmen ceased their killing rampage only when confronted with another gun. It takes a gun to stop a gun. Next time have that person be a teacher or staff member with a concealed weapon, and a vested interest in his and the safety of those around him, whose immediate action would allow so many more students to live. Only a few need to be armed. Assailants do not know who is, thus behave as though everyone is. Like the Uvalde police, they “don’t go in because they do not want to be shot.” The real solution to school massacres is already on campus.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Elon Musk to Twitter, “My offer [to purchase] was based on Twitter’s SEC filings being accurate. Yesterday Twitter’s CEO publicly refused to show proof of 5%. This deal cannot move forward until he does.” It is illegal for Twitter to have more than 5% fake accounts. Is Twitter really 90 million account strong or perhaps half that? Twitter is backed into a corner. Are they hiding the ballooning of their accounts, buyer must know? Think about the advertisers and shareholders who base their advertising expenses and shareholding profits upon precise, not fake, information. If not accurate Twitter could collapse under their own illegal behavior (X22 Reports, Ep. 2777B, May 17, 2022, 15:50).
We are all communists at Twitter!! They call it Commie-fornia!
Enter Siri Murugesan, Twitter senior engineer caught on camera by ProjectVeritas speaking of Elon Musk, the individual above attempting to purchase Twitter to promote free speech. “He’s a capitalist and we [Twitter] weren’t really operating like capitalists, more like very socialists. Like we’re all like commies [Communist] as f**k. Ideologically, it does not make sense like, because we’re actually censoring the right, and not the left. So, everyone on the right wing will be like, ‘bro’. It’s okay to say it, just gotta tolerate it. The Left will be like, ‘No. I’m not gonna tolerate it. I need it censored or else I’m not gonna be on the platform.’ So, it [Twitter] does that on the right. It’s true, there is bias. I don’t know [if] the two parties can truly co-exist on one platform. Like we’re all commie as f**k. Twitter does not believe in free speech. Our jobs are at stake. They hate it. Oh, My God!!! I’m at least like okay with it. But some of my colleagues are like super left, left, left, left, left. You’re there and its commie. They call it Commie-fornia. They’re like, ‘this would be my last day if it. Happens’” (Project veritas.com /Brave Twitter Siru Murugesan).
A Twitter engineer just admitted his organization, and those working there, are as Communist as they can be and Twitter is fully infiltrated. He also admitted that they do not support free speech but are totally engaged in censoring the right.
In another Project Veritas exchange a twitter executive says, “that Twitter is not here to give people free speech.” To which Elon Musk, who is purchasing Twitter to allow on it free speech, tweeted back, as though surprised with the revelation, “Twitter exec. trashing free speech?”
This should shock every American. No platform is more influential in shaping social media and the political opinions of Americans than Twitter, but if it is all socialist propaganda, distortion and lies how can it be trusted? And they freely admit this. Honest people have allowed Twitter to help form their perception of the world.
Normies, those who do not think or question deeply, may have been conditioned for many years by Twitter to accept socialism—begging many questions. What if most of what Twitter called disinformation, was, instead, true? What if the Democrats want the country overrun by illegal immigrants? What if the Left really is attempting to destroy the economy, the Constitution, the country and freedom? What if the vaccine was politicized? What if the 2020 presidential election really was stolen? What if the Democrats are the real racists? What if Twitter was instead a propaganda outlet for the Great Reset and World Government? Normies must now ask themselves these and other questions.
What if what Donald Trump said is true? “Our children are being indoctrinated, our values are being desecrated, our heritage is being obliterated, and our country is being humiliated by a president who has no idea what the hell is going on.” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2747B—[F} Black sites are being closed, Irregular Warfare, A Critical Moment in Time, April 10, 2022, 6:20).
Elon Musk is walking back his long-association with the Democrat Party. “In the past I voted Democrat, because they were (mostly) the kindness party. But they have become the party of division and hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican. Now watch their dirty tricks campaign against me unfold.” He predicted, “attacks on me will escalate dramatically in coming months.” He did not have to wait long, his company Telsa Inc was removed from its S & P 500 ESG Index (X22 Reports, Ep. 2778B—Conspiracy No More, Treason at Highest Levels, It’s a Marathon not a Sprint, May 18, 2022, 15:10).
Sure enough within a day or two came the left’s playbook sexual harassment charge. A woman wanting $250,000, claimed to have been solicited by him during a massage. He responded “describe just one thing, anything at all, (scars, tattoos, …) that isn’t known by the public. She won’t be able to do so because it never happened” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2780—May 20, 2022, 18:20).
Finally, if a large portion of Twitter’s accounts turn out to be fake instead of the accepted 5%, will its value plummet like crazy? Shouldn’t it!?! What about YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and others? Are they also deceiving their advertisers and shareholders? Maybe the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ought to audit these companies as well? If so, will corrupt platforms, pretending to be more popular than they are, experience a domino effect going down?
Perhaps they too share the same Commie-fornia leftist bias. And if Twitter became the mouth piece of the left, perhaps the others have also. If so, maybe we all should say, “I was surrounded by deceit, why could I not have seen?” Most importantly, had these platforms served as a myriad of voices, a choir to deceive me, what do I still believe that is not true?
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
