It always amazes me when otherwise intelligent people are unable to find evidence of God in our governing documents. The Declaration of Independence alone, the signing of which we commemorate July 4th, has five references to God—two in the first paragraph, one in the second, and two in the last. Let us read together its favored parts:
The first and second come together, “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God (emphasis added) entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.” Who is responsible for “the laws of nature” but God—certainly not man nor nature itself. From the “laws of nature” sprang an awareness of natural law (sometimes called common sense), understood by early philosophers to be a source of higher law that never changes.
This was best explained by Cicero, a Roman politician as early as the 1st Century B. C. —even predating the existence of Christianity, when he wrote: “Nor may any other law override it, nor may it be repealed as a whole or in part… Nor is it one thing at Rome and another at Athens, one thing today and another tomorrow, but one eternal and unalterable law, that binds all nations forever.”
Of “Nature’s God,” the creator of the laws of nature, the second reference to deity is, of course, more explicit and needs no addition explanation. Simply, nature too, the wind, rain, sun, planet rotation, the universe itself, even the sprouting of seeds in their time obey God. Organized and governed through natural law—not chaos—is evidence that he exists and remains involved. God indeed is nature’s God as well as our own.
The third reference to God is the word “creator” found in the second paragraph. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Inalienable rights are endowed by God thus cannot be repealed by human law. The three identified may encompass others as well but the Founders saw God as more than just a creator — He wanted his creation free and happy as well. They boldly identified our base for unalienable rights as God, and identified this truth as self-evident. Any person endowed with common sense or reason would/could come to this conclusion.
So passionate were they with respect to these three “God-given rights” that such were identified as the purposes of government. “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
”Moreover, their right of revolution hinged upon a government’s denial of these “God-given rights.” They wrote: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes… But when a long train of abuses and usurpations… evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.” Once again, an appeal to natural law, which emanates from God, was noted and the loss of which always justifies revolution—any time period, people, place, or language! America would be the first to hinge their revolution on natural (God’s) law, as stipulated in the Declaration.
To ensure that the people retained the same right and means of revolution as they were using to claim and obtain their freedom, under the laws of nature as instituted by God, they later institutionalized “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” in the subsequent Bill of Rights of the Constitution. This right they boldly declared in the strongest language possible “shall not be infringed.” They viewed it as “being necessary to the security of a free State.” So its placement as the second most valued freedom in the Bill of Rights had nothing to do with personal safety or hunting, these were already assumed and practiced for centuries. It was specifically placed right after freedom of religion, speech, press and assembly to make certain that these freedoms were never taken from future generations—you and I. It was aimed (pun intended) squarely at government.
The fourth and fifth references to God are found in the last paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. The rightness of their cause was left to God as judge. “We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown….” Not only did God exist but the Founders knew as well that they would be judged by Him for their intentions.
The fifth and last reference to God asks for, and expects given, His divine protection in their revolutionary course of action. “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” No European political prognosticator in that day gave the colonies a ghost of a change against the most powerful nation in the world. God did!!
There was no dissent noted with respect to these references to God and their placement or emphasis in this document by any of the participants then, nor should there be now.
(The above is Dr. Pease’s 668 published column on current events and the Constitution).
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Those in power, at the moment, aim to destroy the 2nd Amendment by any means possible and with it liberty. They know what they are doing. A favorite tool for them are “red flag” laws. These trespass the 2nd amendment as well as the IV, V, VI and XIV. Let us examine the damage done to each.
Amendment II reads in part, “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Government is specifically denied making ANY laws concerning the people’s right to bear arms. No exceptions are permitted outside a new amendment through Article V allowing only the states, 3/4th agreement required, to process a change—not the federal government. Anything short of this is a serious “infringement” (violation) of the Constitution. All executive orders of any president or laws of any congress infringing this right are null and void upon origination. This is so, whether it be Congress’s “red flag” laws or Biden’s magazine limitations; or similar measures originating from any state, county or city. This was insured by the Founding Fathers. No other amendment was more strongly worded against governmental manipulation. The federal government’s present attempt to disarm the civilian population cannot/will not stand.
Amendment IV, reads in part, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” Today computers and electronic devices are our “papers” and “effects” our instruments of self preservation and identity. In the case of arms it is “unreasonable” to confiscate them on someones assumption that they may be used inappropriately. We might also wish to remove the people’s automobiles, knives, hammers, or medicines they MIGHT use to harm themselves or others. Heretofore “probable cause” for government home invasions, searches and seizures was based upon evidence, not opinion or accusation. Again, there exists no crime in having things until wrongfully using them against others. Otherwise personal freedom is non-existing.
Amendment V reads in part: “No person shall be…deprived of…property, without due process of law.” Due process is denied thousands under “red flag” laws. None accused were arrested, charged with a crime, or convicted before their gun(s) is/was confiscation.
Amendment VI requires that all accused must be “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; … be confronted with the witnesses against him; … have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and … have the assistance of counsel for his defence.” In the case of “red flag” laws none of these four required conditions, prior to confiscation, were met as no crime had been committed. The targeted had no opportunity to resist gun confiscation.
Finally, Amendment XIV. “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” This amendment extends all “privileges or immunities” to the states as well. Thus they too, cannot infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. “Red flag” laws totally deny “due process.”
“Red flag” laws, aim squarely at removing the 2nd Amendment from a segment of the civilian population, and violate four other Amendments as well—almost half the Bill of Rights.
“Red flag,” laws are thought to be the “go to legislation” for the presumed mentally unstable of society that could resort to violence against themselves or others. These potentially allow thousands of innocent citizens to be punished only upon the fear that a crime might be committed. Secret lists of innocent people are created by family, acquaintances, and potentially disgruntled ex-lovers or spouses—perhaps even the government. Anyone that can approach a judge with the claim that someone is a danger to himself and/or others, the sheriff is sent to disarm and confiscate that person’s weapon(s). Those identified are punished without having committed a crime. All this, too often, without a shred of evidence of criminal behavior.
In some states anyone can make a phone call to the police—even from out the state. “There is no hearing. All the judge has before him is the statement of concern.” Moreover, “little certainty is needed. Some states allow initial confiscations on just a ‘reasonable suspicion,’ which is little more than a guess or a hunch.”
The biggest problem with red flag evaluations is that they happen “ex parte,” without the defendant present to defend himself. Due process, guaranteed in the Bill of Rights in three places, is denied. If “ex parte,” a second hearing is scheduled, some weeks later, where the defendant must provide evidence of his innocence. You must prove yourself innocent of something that you never did, nor possibly thought of doing, but was previously punished by the forcible confiscation of your weapons(s). What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?“We are dangerously close to destroying the backbone of our judicial system, the presumption of innocence.” If in this situation consider contacting the U.S. & Texas LawShield Blog
Red flag laws are unconstitutional and were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in Caniglia v. Strom et al. as recently as May 17, 2021 by unanimous decision. These violate due process and strip away 2nd Amendment rights from citizens who have committed no crimes. Caniglia’s guns were seized by police acting on a call from his spouse, a clear violation of the due process as articulated in the 4th Amendment (X22 Reports Ep. 2800B-June 15, 2022, 8:10).
Democrats are presently in charge of the legislative and executive branches of the nation and govern perhaps half of state governments. They also greatly dominate main stream media and Internet news censoring everything contrary to their narrative thus coverage on this decision was/is noticeably absent. So far they appear to be disregarding this Supreme Court ruling in their bold, aggressive attempt to disarm America civilians and damage the Constitution.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Elon Musk to Twitter, “My offer [to purchase] was based on Twitter’s SEC filings being accurate. Yesterday Twitter’s CEO publicly refused to show proof of 5%. This deal cannot move forward until he does.” It is illegal for Twitter to have more than 5% fake accounts. Is Twitter really 90 million account strong or perhaps half that? Twitter is backed into a corner. Are they hiding the ballooning of their accounts, buyer must know? Think about the advertisers and shareholders who base their advertising expenses and shareholding profits upon precise, not fake, information. If not accurate Twitter could collapse under their own illegal behavior (X22 Reports, Ep. 2777B, May 17, 2022, 15:50).
We are all communists at Twitter!! They call it Commie-fornia!
Enter Siri Murugesan, Twitter senior engineer caught on camera by ProjectVeritas speaking of Elon Musk, the individual above attempting to purchase Twitter to promote free speech. “He’s a capitalist and we [Twitter] weren’t really operating like capitalists, more like very socialists. Like we’re all like commies [Communist] as f**k. Ideologically, it does not make sense like, because we’re actually censoring the right, and not the left. So, everyone on the right wing will be like, ‘bro’. It’s okay to say it, just gotta tolerate it. The Left will be like, ‘No. I’m not gonna tolerate it. I need it censored or else I’m not gonna be on the platform.’ So, it [Twitter] does that on the right. It’s true, there is bias. I don’t know [if] the two parties can truly co-exist on one platform. Like we’re all commie as f**k. Twitter does not believe in free speech. Our jobs are at stake. They hate it. Oh, My God!!! I’m at least like okay with it. But some of my colleagues are like super left, left, left, left, left. You’re there and its commie. They call it Commie-fornia. They’re like, ‘this would be my last day if it. Happens’” (Project veritas.com /Brave Twitter Siru Murugesan).
A Twitter engineer just admitted his organization, and those working there, are as Communist as they can be and Twitter is fully infiltrated. He also admitted that they do not support free speech but are totally engaged in censoring the right.
In another Project Veritas exchange a twitter executive says, “that Twitter is not here to give people free speech.” To which Elon Musk, who is purchasing Twitter to allow on it free speech, tweeted back, as though surprised with the revelation, “Twitter exec. trashing free speech?”
This should shock every American. No platform is more influential in shaping social media and the political opinions of Americans than Twitter, but if it is all socialist propaganda, distortion and lies how can it be trusted? And they freely admit this. Honest people have allowed Twitter to help form their perception of the world.
Normies, those who do not think or question deeply, may have been conditioned for many years by Twitter to accept socialism—begging many questions. What if most of what Twitter called disinformation, was, instead, true? What if the Democrats want the country overrun by illegal immigrants? What if the Left really is attempting to destroy the economy, the Constitution, the country and freedom? What if the vaccine was politicized? What if the 2020 presidential election really was stolen? What if the Democrats are the real racists? What if Twitter was instead a propaganda outlet for the Great Reset and World Government? Normies must now ask themselves these and other questions.
What if what Donald Trump said is true? “Our children are being indoctrinated, our values are being desecrated, our heritage is being obliterated, and our country is being humiliated by a president who has no idea what the hell is going on.” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2747B—[F} Black sites are being closed, Irregular Warfare, A Critical Moment in Time, April 10, 2022, 6:20).
Elon Musk is walking back his long-association with the Democrat Party. “In the past I voted Democrat, because they were (mostly) the kindness party. But they have become the party of division and hate, so I can no longer support them and will vote Republican. Now watch their dirty tricks campaign against me unfold.” He predicted, “attacks on me will escalate dramatically in coming months.” He did not have to wait long, his company Telsa Inc was removed from its S & P 500 ESG Index (X22 Reports, Ep. 2778B—Conspiracy No More, Treason at Highest Levels, It’s a Marathon not a Sprint, May 18, 2022, 15:10).
Sure enough within a day or two came the left’s playbook sexual harassment charge. A woman wanting $250,000, claimed to have been solicited by him during a massage. He responded “describe just one thing, anything at all, (scars, tattoos, …) that isn’t known by the public. She won’t be able to do so because it never happened” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2780—May 20, 2022, 18:20).
Finally, if a large portion of Twitter’s accounts turn out to be fake instead of the accepted 5%, will its value plummet like crazy? Shouldn’t it!?! What about YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and others? Are they also deceiving their advertisers and shareholders? Maybe the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ought to audit these companies as well? If so, will corrupt platforms, pretending to be more popular than they are, experience a domino effect going down?
Perhaps they too share the same Commie-fornia leftist bias. And if Twitter became the mouth piece of the left, perhaps the others have also. If so, maybe we all should say, “I was surrounded by deceit, why could I not have seen?” Most importantly, had these platforms served as a myriad of voices, a choir to deceive me, what do I still believe that is not true?
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
So what would happened if Roe v. Wade where overturned? The issue would go back to the states where it was prior to 1973, and constitutionally belongs—the federal government would, as before, have no jurisdiction over the issue. It was taken from them in violation of Amendment 10, where all power resides other than that given to the federal government in Article I, Section 8, as we described in my recent column, “The Word Abortion has never been in the Constitution.” Finally, Planned Parenthood would receive no federal allocations so their extermination centers would largely disappear.
According to the Guttmacher Institute there are 13 states that have banned most or all abortions. These are: Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, N. Dakota, Oklahoma, S. Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming. Five additional states have a preexisting Roe v. Wade abortion ban on the books that would probably be reactivated. These are Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, W. Virginia and Wisconsin. Yet another four states currently have laws banning abortion after the six-week mark which presently have been ruled unconstitutional but probably would be reversed if Roe was overturned. Finally, another four states Florida, Indiana, Montana and Nebraska appear likely to ban or severely restrict abortion if Roe is overturned “based upon current legislative effort.” [X22 Reports, Ep. 2767B—Much to be Revealed Renegade Panicking, The Deal Keeps Iran Quiet, Control lost. May 4, 2022].
Twenty six states, over half of America, are likely to abandon abortion as an acceptable alternative to birth control. It is increasingly difficult to make the babies pay for their right to exist when they have a heartbeat at six weeks old. The stain and stench of innocent blood is in the practice and cannot be hidden anymore.
“I could give money specifically to abort a black baby”.
Then too, revelations of genocide by Planned Parenthood in Idaho against black babies turns the stomachs of Christian and moral people. Project Veritas caught on tape a Caller’s question, “What about abortions for under aged minority groups? The PP Employee: “Certainly and showed a willingness to accept larger donations to abort black babies!” “Caller: We just think …You know… the less black kids out there the better. PP Employee: (laughs) Understandable! Understandable!”
Abortion is the Democrat Parties sacred cow. Virtually all Democrats look the other way (a form of approval) of the genocide of their own unwanted or inconvenient humankind. If racism and eugenics have merged with the party, as appears so in the conversation above to “kill off segments of the population,” such is unacceptable in any society. Reportedly 79% of planned parenthood clinics are in minority neighborhoods. ([X22 Reports, Ep. 2767B, May 4, 2022, 27:00). Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger certainly supported eugenics of black babies.
This prompted Candace Owens to say, “If it wasn’t for the abortion industry, the black population would be virtually doubled today.” (Tucker Carlson). Let that sink in. If blacks ever come to recognize that they have been the targeted race of white democrats for black eugenics, the Democratic Party would cease to exist overnight and Planned Parenthood facilities would be burned to the ground nationwide by them.
“If it wasn’t for the abortion industry, the black population would be virtually doubled today.”
Another dark secret seems to be festering in Ukraine already seen as the Deep State laundering capital of the world for dark money, bioweapons labs, illegal drugs and etc. JuliansRum posed the question, “Where do all these aborted baby body parts go? And follows up with Ukraine as a “baby maker” operation. He asks: “Why is Ukraine at the world’s forefront of fetal stem cell therapies? —The first fetal stem cell treatment in humans occurred at the National Medical University of Ukraine. —The world’s first center to use fetal stem cells for therapeutic purposes in humans was founded in Kyiv, Ukraine. —The world’s first ever fully licensed fetal stem cell bank was in Ukraine. —The world’s largest fetal stem cell therapy clinic (EmCell) is in Ukraine. Stem cell anti-aging therapy is big biz there.” He ends with the observation that “Ukraine has become the self-styled stem cell capital of the world” (X22 Reports, Ep. 2767B—May 4, 2022).
BBC News was the first news outlet to give focus to Ukrainian research in the area, (“Ukraine Babies in Stem cell probe,” BBC News , by Matthew Hill, BBC Health Correspondent, Dec. 12, 2006). The column hypothesized, “There is heated debate about the ethics of using stem cells. Healthy new-born babies may have been killed in Ukraine to feed a flourishing international trade in stem cells, evidence obtained by BBC suggests.” The report “describes a general culture of trafficking of children snatched at birth, and a wall of silence from hospital staff upwards.”
Why Ukraine? For the same reason 13 bio-weapons labs existed there. The Deep State is the Ukrainian government and is unregulated in its dark science and dark money. Ukraine appears to be the world’s Deep State playground for activities that civilized nations would never permit such as “gain of function research” on human killer diseases and/or stem cell “research on live human cells.” Far fetched perhaps, but that is what they said about the “non-existent” bio-weapons labs before Putin took them out—something no longer seriously disputed. Conspiracy theories have a history of becoming conspiracy realities when enough money is attached.
So what would happen to abortion if Roe v. Wade where overturned? Almost anything from returning the issue to the states in accordance with Amendment 10, to deeper revelations about eugenics on blacks in America, to even darker revelations of stem cell research to preserve the youth of rich, old people—all positive for ending the darkest chapter in world history. Frankly, I believe America is tired of the guilt and shame which always accompanies the practice.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
Put bluntly Democrats support extermination of their own unwanted kind and Republicans went along with it because it was a form of birth control. Two issues have forced a wider gulf on abortion than ever: 1) science has shown a fetal heartbeat at six weeks of pregnancy and 2) many taxpayers oppose funding extermination clinics of their own human kind. A strict interpretation of the Constitution would not have allowed either. The word abortion has never been in the Constitution, in 1973, or now.
Many who work in Planned Parenthood centers admit that perhaps 80% of what they do is exterminate unwanted humans. This is not family planning; it is instead the destruction of the family. Nor are such centers primarily for women’s health unless you can argue that pregnant women are unhealthy because they are pregnant. Abortion is not healthcare.
If women’s health were the “real” issue, redistributing Title X grants to non-Planned Parenthood facilities would better serve vastly more women and more of their health concerns. But funding extermination centers remains the primary purpose of Planned Parenthood.
Since Roe v. Wade we have aborted 63,776,644. in the U.S (http://www.numberofabortions.com/). A review of abortion pictures on the Internet often show tiny human body parts separated from the whole body when a scalpel was used to cut up the body making it easier to expel.
Abortion would not be a federal issue if both political parties followed the listed limits of federal power in the Constitution as designed. Again, the word abortion is not found in the Constitution, nor inferred, and no new amendment to the Constitution has been added moving it from a state power—Amendment 10 (where all powers not specifically identified in the Constitution as federal reside)—to a federal prerogative.
Without extreme, constitutional perversion to original intent the Supreme Court cannot rule, as it did in Roe v. Wade in 1973, in such a way as to create new law in an area where no federal law first existed or was subsequently added by way of a constitutional amendment. That no constitutional authority ever existed for Roe v. Wade in the first place, even less exists to extend that travel direction today.
Article 1, Section 8 lists federal powers. This clause divides all federal power into the four following areas: to tax, pay debt, provide for the general welfare and common defense. So as to restrict the federal government from enlarging its power, which is its natural tendency to do, the last two grants of power of the four each had an additional eight clauses giving clarity to what was meant by general welfare (clauses 2-9) and common defense (clauses 10-17). Outside these qualifiers the federal government has NO power to tax, spend, legislate, administrate or adjudicate. None!!
Even with the clarification of the list, states fearing that the federal government might still like to grow at their expense, refused to ratify the Constitution without additional restrictions harnessing it more fully to the enumerated powers, hence the Bill of Rights. These end with the federal handcuffs of Amendment 10: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The problem with the federal government going off the list and funding or assuming powers clearly not on it is that each time it does so—even once—the stronger the inclination to do so again. One minor departure begets another until one notices that what the federal government does has little or no relationship to the list. The result, in this case, is that mothers, encouraged by their federal government, exterminated over 60 million of their own; about ten times the number of Jews killed in the Nazi holocaust death camps, now so universally condemned.
But a fake connection to the Constitution was not the only fake part of Roe v. Wade. Jane Roe, Norma McCorvey, “AKA Jane Roe.” the plaintiff in the landmark 1973 case that legalized abortion in America was fake also. In the mid-1990s, McCorvey made a public religious and political conversion. “She was baptized on television in a backyard swimming pool; she wore overalls and came out beaming. She declared herself newly pro-life and spent the last two decades of her life crusading against the ruling her own case had made possible.” She announced “to the camera with an oxygen tube dangling from her nose” and told director Nick Sweeney, “This is my deathbed confession.”
“She never really supported the antiabortion movement,” she told Sweeney, in a scene filmed in 2017. “I took their money and they put me out in front of the camera and told me what to say, and that’s what I’d say.” “It was all an act?” the director asked. “Yeah,” she says. “I was good at it, too.” In fact, she had never had an abortion either. “By the time the Supreme Court handed down its decision, she’d been forced to carry out her pregnancy; the child had already been adopted” (Jane Roe, May 20, 2020, Washington Post, “‘Jane Roe,’ from Roe v. Wade, made a stunning deathbed confession. Now What? By Monica Hesse, May 20, 2020 New documentary ‘AKA Jane Roe’). Still, even a deathbed confession has some value But her story is a part of the deceit and national blood stain that surrounds this issue.
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
In April, Joe Biden made another bid for America taking the leadership of and implementing the new world order government as soon as possible. “There is gonna be a new world order out there and we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.” But as soon as the NWO is implemented (world government) doesn’t that destroy the Constitution?
It is time someone said the obvious. Joe Biden is an enemy of the Constitution and the most dangerous executive officer to it in U.S. History. Everything he has done undermines and works to destroy it. So what would happen to our Founding documents should he, and his party, install the New World Order? Let us look at each.
The Declaration of Independence would be dumped on the ash-bin of history with its five references to God as its author. There would be no self-evident truths, only the decrees emanating from the new world government. Any future attempt to install the notion of independence from the world government would be met by swift and very public executions. This document would be removed from all history books world-wide to disincentivize it ever happening again.
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” Such an expression would never find utterance in the pages of history again. It implies that the people have a collective will separate from the world government and the right to perfect government on their own. It infers that there is not already, through the world government perfection, justice, or tranquility and that the general welfare and blessings of liberty are not already fully in place. The world government already believes they have created “collective” liberty and they care not what “we the people” or “our posterity” thinks. The needs of individual man vanishes into history.
The Constitution’s seven Articles will all be unnecessary as they enable a government existing outside the world government with legislative, executive, and judicial branches which cannot be allowed. The idea that the people could harness their government to 17 specific limitations as in Article I, Section 8 is the anti-theses of world government. Worse, is that mere people could read this list and know when their government has overreached its authority. My point, there is no restriction on world government, the people whether stupidly, knowingly, ignorantly or otherwise—it does not matter after the NWO is in place—gave it up. Liberty no longer exists on planet earth. Satin prevails—not Christ. All decision making power emanates for every resident of the planet from the United Nations or some unidentified bureaucracy. There is no discussion, no debate—only obedience.
Whatever the new executive branch, whether appointed or otherwise, need not be from the people as Article II now requires nor its office holder necessarily be even a citizen. Remember in accepting The New World Order the people gave up their authority to self government. The functions of Article III, the Supreme Court, would be absorbed by an unelected World Court which may or not not have any U.S. citizens as members and cares little or nothing about national sovereignty, justice, equity, and rule of law. Article IV goes away. Only world government exists, everyone just follows directives. No Article V making adjustment to the Constitution as needed. No supremacy Clause of the Constitution. There is no Constitution—no prohibition of the world elite doing anything it wishes to you—you are now their slave.
The Bill of Rights, so unique in the history of the world, listing the people’s freedom of religion, speech, assembly, press, and the right to peaceably assemble, and forbidding the government interference in theses areas, would vanish. Precious, sometimes centuries-long historical wins: probable cause, due process, double jeopardy, freedom from self-in-criminalization, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures and etc. evaporate. Jury trials of our peers end. Cruel and unusual punishment returns for “necessary” confessions and convictions.
Gone is also the protection from excessive government housed as Amendment 10, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” Thus making certain that all power not specifically noted in the Constitution belonged to the states and or the people—not to an ever hungrier federal government. Again, all important decisions in the NWO emanate from a government inaccessible to Americans on the other side of the globe—say Davous, Switzerland.
Then when the citizenry realize’s that they have lost everything—even their right of revolution—should the government move to do away with the Constitution, they will remember their Second Amendment and will wish that they had thought to have saved freedom from extinction before it was too late. “A well regulated Militia (the people), being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Finally, this phrase has real meaning—the government is forbidden ANY role in it.
Joe Biden has laid his ax to the Constitution to extinguish it in favor of his NWO—this year if possible. This is not an idle threat but reality. If the NWO is implemented with certainty it destroys the Constitution. They cannot coexist. He is the biggest threat to the Constitution in U.S. history. Invite your friends to protect the Constitution with you by forwarding this message. American must save its sacred Constitution NOW or enter into a new Dark Ages .
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www.LibertyUnderFire.org.
