By Harold Pease Ph.D.
We are coming down to the 2022 elections. Every day Patriots are proving more Deep State corruption and the party in power is losing support. If they do not retain political power many of them know they will go to prison. To survive they must stop the exposure. Censorship has not worked. People are going around the fake news propaganda and doing their own homework. Digital soldiers are revealing everything censored on mainstream media. Still, the Deep State know that they must take the focus off their corruption. They need a scare event that will stop the election, if possible, and/or, at minimum, fill the news outlets with news for months or years. The two best options for accomplishing this are World War III and/or civil war. They are not above starting either.
The following is the likely anticipated scare event, predicted by Patriots for many weeks, which could lead to war with Russia. Russia has accused the United States of an act of war—the attack on its Nord Stream pipelines feeding Germany while much of Europe desperately need fuel this winter. Perhaps no event since the Cuban Missile Crisis is more threatening in our relationship with Russia than this. In the week following the attacks Sept. 26, this is what we now know.
Two deep underwater “explosions severed the Nord Stream pipelines under the Baltic Sea” dropping pipe gas pressure down to zero. “One of the two explosions measures 2.3 on the Richter Scale of earthquake intensity, but this was no earthquake.” It was two separately and intentionally delivered explosions. The result, “the conduit for Russian gas to Europe is broken” and not likely repairable until next summer leaving Europe, especially Germany, facing an approaching winter with a critical—even life threatening—fuel shortage.
The explosions occurred Monday September 26, 2022 the first, at about 2:00 a.m., the second that evening at 7:04 p.m. There were no military exercises that day in the area. So who is responsible for these intentional strikes on Russia’s fuel lines to Europe? Bill Hennessy shared the best analysis in print of how that can be determined by evaluating the crime as a cop would, respecting who had the means, motive, and opportunity (“ANALYSIS: Nord Stream Pipelines Sabotaged, and Only One Country Benefits,” Gateway Pundit, September 28, 2022).
He reasoned, “Only a government with an advanced naval warfare capability could have executed the sabotage. That limits suspects to Germany, Great Britain, France, the United States, Russia, and China.” Of these France and China are easily removed because their naval presence in the area “would have raised flags” as being unusual. That left four: Germany, Great Britain, Russia, and the U.S.
Of these, motive probably excludes Great Britain and, especially Germany, as neither has “motive to damage its energy lifeline.” Moreover, the “UK has its hands full with forming a government. It is unlikely the Brits would attempt such a caper.” This leaves Russia and the U.S.
But Russia does have a motive to “inflict long-term pain on Europe for sending lethal arms to Ukraine. But Russia didn’t need to blow up the pipelines. Russia controls the valves that send or halt gas flow to Europe, and she’s already turned off the spigot. Russia paid for a portion of the pipeline and expects to resume profitable energy exports to Europe once the war with Ukraine settles. Why would Russia cut off its own nose?”
Hennessy concluded, “that leaves the United States.” It benefited when it “became the number one exporter of liquified natural gas to Europe once Russia cut off the flow. German dependence on US LNG is a carrot to keep Germany in the sanction alliance. With winter approaching and German unrest on the rise, the State Department would have been concerned the Germans would go wobbly, reduce sanctions, cut off arms to Ukraine, and beg Putin for energy. The loss of the Nord Stream pipelines eliminates that path to renewed gas imports to Germany.”
In addition “the Biden family has long been tangled up in natural gas and Ukraine. Hunter Biden was on the board of Ukraine’s largest natural gas company—a position that provided Ukrainian oligarchs with access to Joe Biden” and the Biden family “millions from the deal.” Joe Biden also expects to somehow benefit politically in the election ahead from villainizing Putin.
Finally, who had opportunity to blow the gas lines? “Seapower magazine—the official magazine of the Navy League—reported in June on a US exercise in the Baltic Sea, directly over the spots where two massive, undersea explosions took out the Nord Stream pipeline.” The magazine “highlights new technology allowing the Navy to detonate targets from miles away.” Hennessy concluded, “the Navy had the opportunity to plant explosives on the pipes in June for remote detonation at the time of the President’s choosing.” Looks like he chose September 26.
Blowing the gas lines is an act of war committed on Russia by the Biden Administration. My God!! Let us pray Russia does not retaliate. The threat of not being warm enough to survive the winter is also a crime against humanity on all of Europe. The Deep State is behind it all.
But there is more—a confession of sorts. The Biden Administration previously threatened to take the Nord Stream pipelines out. Department of State Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.” AND, ABC News quotes President Biden as having said, “If Russia invades…then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.” Reporter: “But how will you do that, exactly, since…the project is in Germany’s control?” Biden: “I promise you, we will be able to do that” (abcnws/3B5SScx See also “Guess Who Threatened to Take the Russian Nord Stream Pipelines Offline Before They Were Sabotaged This Week?, by Jim Hoft, September 27, 2022).
Dr. Harold Pease is a syndicated columnist and an expert on the United States Constitution. He has dedicated his career to studying the writings of the Founding Fathers and applying that knowledge to current events. He taught history and political science from this perspective for over 30 years at Taft College. Newspapers have permission to publish this column. Column # 682. To read more of his weekly articles, please visit www. www.LibertyUnderFire.org.